by Sara McCaslin, PhD Sara McCaslin, PhD No Comments

Startup and Running Friction in Polymer Bearings

Startup and running friction can vary based on several different factors, and in this article we focus on what they are, why their values differ, and typical coefficients, as well as a detailed look at why these differences occur. It ends with a discussion of what impact startup and running friction have on bearing design.

Startup and Running Friction

Polymer bearings tend to exhibit higher breakaway (startup) friction than steady-state running friction due to factors such as static adhesion, microasperity interlocking, and transfer-film formation dynamics. 

The startup friction coefficient µₛ is measured at the onset of motion and represents static friction. The term “startup” does not refer solely to time zero, however. It represents the peak friction force or torque required to break the bearing free after a period of rest. Startup friction is actually the regime of dry contact when the polymer surface is still unconditioned. Unconditioned  means that the transfer film on the counterface is incomplete or patchy

The running friction coefficient µₖ represents a kinetic or dynamic measure of friction. It takes place when steady sliding motion is established and is represented by. Running friction relates to the frictional resistance that exists when two surfaces are in motion, steadily sliding against each other. 

Running friction applies after the initial breakaway event has occurred and the system has moved past issues such as static adhesion and micro-locking. As a result, the coefficient of running friction is typically lower and more stable than startup friction, especially for materials such as PTFE and UHMW-PE.

Why Startup and Running Friction Can Differ in a Polymer

There are some key factors that differentiate startup friction from running friction in polymers. For example, at rest, there is adhesion and junction growth. Polymer chains can increase the real contact load at under load rest (creep/relaxation), thereby increasing µₛ.In addition, at startup, there will be surface roughness and plowing. The roughness increases issues with mechanical interlocking and plowing. These two effects also raise the starting friction value.

In running friction conditions, materials like PTFE form a transfer film that reduces the effect of asperities and surface roughness, which reduces running friction. There is, however, a risk of stick-slip. This phenomenon is more likely to occur when the stiffness of the system is low, the speed is low, and the µₛ / µₖ ratio is high.

Typical Coefficients of Friction

The values below represent commonly used engineering polymers and are typical dry sliding vs steel values. These values can vary with pressure, speed, temperature, finish, fillers, and test method.

  • PTFE (virgin)
    • Startup friction (µₛ): ~0.05–0.10, often nearly identical to running friction
    • Running friction (µₖ): ~0.05–0.10
    • Minimal difference between startup and running friction
  • PEEK (unfilled)
    • Startup friction (µₛ): ~0.20
    • Running friction (µₖ): ~0.25
    • Exhibits a noticeable increase from startup to running friction
  • UHMW-PE
    • Startup friction (µₛ): ~0.15–0.20
    • Running friction (µₖ): ~0.10–0.20
    • Running friction can be equal to or lower than startup friction
  • Nylon 66 (PA66)
    • Startup friction (µₛ): ~0.20 (against steel)
    • Running friction (µₖ): ~0.15–0.25 (typical)
    • Moderate variability depending on surface finish and condition

What Is Behind the Difference Between Startup and Running Friction

Several factors account for the difference between startup and running friction. Pressure and dwell time, for example, mean that higher loads and long dwell times increase the real contact area and have the potential to raise µₛ. For speed, higher speeds can actually reduce friction after the polymer transfer film stabilizes, but can also raise heat generation. 

Temperatures are known to impact polymer modulus and creep, which can shift both µₛ and µₖ and alter the risk of stick-slip. In addition, the counterface material and hardness will affect the adhesion and transfer film, which is why it is important that the frictional coefficient used in design calculations represents the friction against the counterface material (e.g., PTFE vs steel, PEEK vs aluminum).

Note that PTFE-filled PEEK, MoS₂-filled nylon, and glass/bronze-filled PTFE shift friction and wear differently, often lowering friction but sometimes increasing counterface wear.

Surface finish also has a significant impact. If the surface finish is too rough, plowing will occur, increasing both friction and wear. On the other hand, if the surface finish is too smooth it can increase adhesion issues.

Impact on Bearing Design

Startup and running friction impact material selection, clearance, and surface finish in bearing design. Startup friction is dominated by static friction and adhesion at rest. This fact significantly impacts breakaway torque and can be a limiting factor in low-speed, intermittent, or precision motion systems. In such systems, stick-slip, noise, and control instability are unacceptable. 

Running friction, on the other hand, is governed by dynamic friction. Once motion is established, it controls steady-state heat generation, wear rate, and long-term dimensional stability. It directly influences PV limits and service life. 

Because many polymers exhibit higher startup friction than running friction, engineers need to balance low breakaway forces with acceptable operating temperatures and wear. This is usually accomplished through the use of self-lubricating materials, fillers, or surface texturing to manage both regimes. A successful polymer bearing design accounts for the full friction lifecycle, ensuring reliable motion at startup without sacrificing durability during continuous operation.

Conclusion

Startup and running friction have a significant impact on bearing design, as well as factors such as material fillers, pressure, temperature, and counterface material. If you are looking for a polymer bearing solution, contact the experts at Advanced EMC. Our team of bearing specialists can help you find the best bearing material for your design and can help you select the optimal material from our range of bearing-grade polymers.

by Sara McCaslin, PhD Sara McCaslin, PhD No Comments

Machined and Molded Polymer Bearings: Nylon 66, PEEK, and PPS

Nylon 66, PEEK, and PPS are available in bearing grades, but how should they be manufactured? The choice of manufacturing method can have a significant impact on their tolerances, performance, and cost. 

This blog post focuses on machined and molded polymer bearings, including their benefits and limits, how they compare to metal options, and the best ways of manufacturing bearings made from three very different materials: Nylon 66, PEEK, and PPS. 

Introduction to Polymer Bearings

Polymer bearings are low-friction, lightweight alternatives to traditional bearings. They are corrosion-resistant and offer varying degrees of chemical resistance. Polymer bearings are also known for their ability to run dry or with minimal lubrication, as well as good wear characteristics. They are also electrically insulating and offer quieter operation than their metal counterparts.

However, polymer bearings do have their limits. They are more susceptible to thermal expansion and may have lower load limits and PV than their metal counterparts, but the addition of fillers can mitigate this issue. In some cases, they may be susceptible to moisture uptake. 

The table below summarizes the major differences between metal and polymer bearings.

Metal vs Polymer Bearings

FeatureMetal BearingsPolymer Bearings
FrictionLow only with lubricationLow due to inherent lubricity
LubricationRequiredOften not required
Wear MechanismAbrasive/adhesive fatigueTransfer film formation
CorrosionPossibleNearly immune
Shock/VibrationNo dampingNatural damping
SpeedHighModerate
LoadHigherModerate
Temperature LimitsExcellentVaries by polymer
MaintenanceHigherVery low

Machined vs. Molded Polymer Bearings

Machined bearings are best for small production runs where tight tolerances and complex geometries are involved, and machining is ideal for prototypes, custom components, and specialty rotating equipment. This approach to manufacturing bearings also allows the material to remain homogenous with no molded-in stresses.

Molded bearings are the best option for high-volume production, and they are more cost-effective for simpler geometries. Molding also means reduced part-to-part variation; however, molded-in stress may be present, and there are limits to surface finish.

When choosing between machined and molded polymer bearings, the key factors are:

  • Geometry
  • Tolerances
  • Cost
  • Production volume

Nylon 66, PEEK, and PPS

Among the various options for polymer bearings are Nylon 66, PPS, and PEEK. The table below summarizes the differences between these materials.

Performance Comparison: Nylon 66 vs. PPS vs. PEEK

Property / FactorNylon 66PPSPEEK
Max Continuous Use Temperature~100–120°C~200–220°C~240–260°C
Wear ResistanceGood (improved with lubrication)Very goodExcellent (especially filled grades)
FrictionLowLowVery low
Moisture AbsorptionHigh (can swell, affects tolerances)Very lowVery low
Dimensional StabilityModerate (affected by humidity)HighVery high
Chemical ResistanceModerateExcellentExcellent
Mechanical StrengthGoodHighVery high
Impact ResistanceVery goodModerateGood
Creep ResistanceModerateGoodExcellent
PV CapabilityLow–MediumMedium–HighHigh–Very High
CostLowMediumHigh
Machining SuitabilityExcellentExcellentExcellent (best with filled grades)
MoldabilityExcellentGoodGood
Typical ApplicationsRollers, appliance bearings, automotive interior componentsPumps, compressors, chemical processing, precision housingsAerospace, oil & gas, high-speed bearings, semiconductor tools

Manufacturing Nylon 66, PEEK, and PPS Bearings

There are several different bearing materials available, but of interest in this blog post are Nylon 66, PPS, and PEEK bearings.

Nylon 66

Nylon 66 is very easy to mold because of its low viscosity, forging processing window, and good flow characteristics. However, there is going to be high mold shrinkage, which requires careful part design to keep warpage under control. Nylon also absorbs moisture, which means that drying is important before molding takes place. 

Nylon also machines easily, but its high ductility leads to stringy chips that necessitate the use of chip-breakers. Heat buildup is also an issue with nylon, and moisture absorption can impact the level of precision that can be achieved. It does, however, respond well to secondary machining on already molded parts, but does not work well with tight-tolerance CNC components.

PEEK

Because PEEK high a high melt temperature around 343°C, a very narrow thermal window that requires precision temperature control, and requires a heated mold, it is considered challenging to mold. However, with the right processing parameters and careful design, PPS can be molded and can manufacture parts with excellent thermal and mechanical performance (but is more expensive). 

PEEK is very difficult to machine. Its high modulus and hardness make it especially tough on cutting tools, and reinforced grades can be highly abrasive. It also generates an abundance of heat, thus requiring the use of coolants. However, machining PEEK supports excellent tolerances and surface finishes when the right combination of feed and speed is used. In fact, PEEK is frequently machined for low-volume aerospace and medical components.

PPS

PPS is not as easy to mold as Nylon 66 because its melt temperature is higher, it possesses a narrower processing window, and has high viscosity. However, it does exhibit very low shrinkage and excellent dimensional stability. PPS molding is very predictable and an excellent option once the right processing parameters have been figured out.

PPS is machinable, definitely more so than Nylon, but tends to be more brittle. It produces short chips and there is a risk of edge chipping during more aggressive cuts. On the other hand, it is good for tight tolerances. Note that filled grades of PPS can accelerate tool wear. Machining PPS is ideal for high-precision parts where dimensional stability is important.

Conclusion

Machined and molded Nylon 66, PPS, and PEEK bearings continue to gain traction because of properties such as low friction, wear characteristics, damping, corrosion resistance, and chemical compatibility. If you are in need of polymer bearings, Advanced EMC is here to help. Our team of engineers and bearing experts can help you from initial design to manufacturing to testing. Contact us today to learn more.