by Sara McCaslin, PhD Sara McCaslin, PhD No Comments

Creep and Stress Relaxation in High-Performance Polymer Seals

Creep and stress relaxation are types of time-dependent deformation that matter in sealing as too many engineers in the field typically see “assembled dry, passed leak test, then seeps later.” Sealing force is not a fixed number: it decays over time. And polymer seals can be affected by factors such as viscoelasticity, temperature sensitivity, and constraint effects. 

This article explores core definitions and concepts related to creep and stress relaxation, then covers how different polymer sealing materials behave and tips for the design and installation of seals to minimize these issues.

Definitions and Concepts for Creep and Stress Relaxation

Creep is defined as the increase in strain under constant applied stress. The constant stress can be, for example,  contact stress from interference, bolt load transferred through a gasket, or differential pressure loading. The results of creep are dimensional change, extrusion growth, reduced interference, and/or a contact pattern shift.

Cold flow refers to creep at moderate or ambient temperature and is controlled by a combination of stress and constraints. As a type of creep, cold flow is dominated by a combination of viscoelastic and viscoplastic deformation under a sustained compressive load.

Stress relaxation is decreasing stress under constant strain as the result of fixed gland volume, captured seal, or fixed squeeze. This can be a problem for static seals, where the gland maintains constant displacement, not constant stress. The results of stress relaxation include clamp-load loss, loss of sealing force, and an increased possibility of leakage.

Polymers can still look like they kept their shape, but they may not be pushing as hard against the metal anymore. In elastomers, “compression set” is mainly about the rubber not springing back. In polymers, the bigger issue is that the internal stress slowly bleeds off over time, so sealing force drops even if the part does not look significantly deformed.

When a polymer is compressed, part of the squeezed portion will spring back right away, but part of it returns slowly, and another part never returns because the material has permanently shifted shape. The longer a seal is under compression, the more the polymer begins to relax and flow, so even after the load is removed, it may not be able to rebound to restore the original sealing force. 

And if you compress a polymer seal and then release it, the force on the way back will usually be lower than on the way in because some energy is lost inside the material. That’s why repeated squeeze-and-release cycles will not bring the seal back to the original force level.

Material Behavior in High-Performance Seal Polymers

PTFE (unfilled): PTFE has extremely low friction and is very chemically resistant, but it gives up the sealing load over time. Virgin PTFE tends to creep and relax under sustained compression, therefore requiring a strong gland support, tight extrusion-gap control, or spring energization.

PTFE (filled): Filled PTFE holds up better because fillers increase stiffness and reduce cold-flow behavior. Filled PTFE can usually retain its sealing force longer than virgin PTFE, but the filler used can also increase friction and may affect counterface wear.

PEEK: PEEK is typically chosen when long-term load retention matters greatly. PEEK’s higher stiffness means better resistance to creep and stress relaxation, though solid gland design and surface control still matter. PEEK is also available in filled variants that can impact its properties.

UHMW-PE: UHMW-PE is excellent for abrasion and low friction, but it can still relax under long compressive dwell, especially if stresses are high or support is limited. It performs best when the design itself minimizes sustained stress and prevents extrusion.

PAI (Torlon): PAI offers the strongest resistance to time-dependent deformation in this group. It retains shape and sealing load well, making it a strong fit for high loads and elevated temperatures where other polymers may drift.

MaterialCreep ResistanceStress Relaxation ResistanceRebound After Long DwellExtrusion Risk (if poorly supported)
PTFE (unfilled)LowLowLowHigh
PTFE (filled)ModerateModerateLow–ModerateModerate
PEEKHighHighModerate–HighLow–Moderate
UHMW-PELow–ModerateLow–ModerateModerateModerate–High
PAI (Torlon)Very HighHigh–Very HighHighLow

Design Variables That Control Creep and Relaxation

Gland constraint is the first major factor. A fully confined gland gives the seal fewer places to move, which cuts down creep flow and helps prevent extrusion. If the gland is only partially confined, any clearance becomes an escape route for the seal, and support has to be both radial and axial. Radial support keeps the polymer from pushing into the extrusion gap under pressure. Axial support helps prevent shifting and uneven edge loading. The small geometry details count as well; add corner radii and lead-in chamfers, and avoid sharp edges that create stress concentrations. Also, remember tolerance stack-up: as the seal relaxes, the “effective” clearance and contact conditions can change even if the metal parts do not.

More squeeze is not going to automatically be safer. Higher initial stress can accelerate creep and stress relaxation, especially with heat. The goal is to start with enough contact stress to seal, then still have enough after the material settles. That means designing around the minimum required contact stress at end-of-life, not just at assembly.

Extrusion gap control is about finding where pressure can escape and blocking it. The gap changes with temperature, pressure-driven hardware deflection, and assembly variation. Backup rings help by mechanically closing off that path. Their details matter, though.

Surface finish can make or break long-term performance. Roughness peaks concentrate stress and encourage localized flow, and surface lay can create leak paths. With filled polymers, counterface hardness matters because wear risk can increase with the wrong pairing. Aim for a finish that reduces stress peaks without creating new friction or lubrication issues.

Hardware stiffness also impacts load retention. Flexible joints can magnify clamp-load loss as polymers relax, so stiffer flanges, spacers, and bolt patterns will significantly assist with stability. For demanding duty cycles, spring-energized seals are an excellent option as they add an additional force to compensate for potential issues, such as relaxation, wear, thermal cycling, and small misalignment. 

Installation Tips for Mitigating Creep and Stress Relaxation

Many issues with creep start at installation, where a small nick, a cut, or a twisted seal can leak early, then get blamed on cold flow. Over-compressing the seal during assembly also makes it worse by driving high stress that speeds up relaxation and can leave permanent deformation. A simple fix is better handling and proper lubrication during installation to reduce the potential for surface damage and help the seal seat without problems due to uneven stress.

Load management matters just as much after assembly. Polymer gaskets and seats often benefit from controlled retorque protocols (when the application allows it) because the initial load can drop quickly during the first dwell. A common approach is initial torque, a short wait, then a retorque and verification check. Keep in mind that if over-torque pushes stress too high, it can accelerate creep and shorten the sealing life.

Finally, storage can quietly pre-load your failure. If a seal sits compressed on the shelf, it may relax before it sees service, starting life with serious issues related to sealing force. Temperature history matters as well, especially if parts are stored near heat sources or in hot warehouses. When possible, ship and store seals uncompressed, and for critical applications, controlled conditioning and careful packaging can protect long-term load retention.

Conclusion

Creep, cold flow, and stress relaxation are not mysterious defects, but rather predictable behaviors that appear whenever polymers sit under load for long periods. For this reason, treat them as design inputs and build a sealing system around them by choosing the right material, controlling deformation with proper gland constraint, relying on stiff hardware to maintain load, and validating the design with tests that match real pressure, temperature, and dwell-time conditions.

Advanced EMC is here to help with all your sealing needs, and our engineers are happy to help you navigate your way through potential creep and stress relaxation issues. Contact us today!

by Sara McCaslin, PhD Sara McCaslin, PhD No Comments

Machined and Molded Polymer Bearings: Nylon 66, PEEK, and PPS

Nylon 66, PEEK, and PPS are available in bearing grades, but how should they be manufactured? The choice of manufacturing method can have a significant impact on their tolerances, performance, and cost. 

This blog post focuses on machined and molded polymer bearings, including their benefits and limits, how they compare to metal options, and the best ways of manufacturing bearings made from three very different materials: Nylon 66, PEEK, and PPS. 

Introduction to Polymer Bearings

Polymer bearings are low-friction, lightweight alternatives to traditional bearings. They are corrosion-resistant and offer varying degrees of chemical resistance. Polymer bearings are also known for their ability to run dry or with minimal lubrication, as well as good wear characteristics. They are also electrically insulating and offer quieter operation than their metal counterparts.

However, polymer bearings do have their limits. They are more susceptible to thermal expansion and may have lower load limits and PV than their metal counterparts, but the addition of fillers can mitigate this issue. In some cases, they may be susceptible to moisture uptake. 

The table below summarizes the major differences between metal and polymer bearings.

Metal vs Polymer Bearings

FeatureMetal BearingsPolymer Bearings
FrictionLow only with lubricationLow due to inherent lubricity
LubricationRequiredOften not required
Wear MechanismAbrasive/adhesive fatigueTransfer film formation
CorrosionPossibleNearly immune
Shock/VibrationNo dampingNatural damping
SpeedHighModerate
LoadHigherModerate
Temperature LimitsExcellentVaries by polymer
MaintenanceHigherVery low

Machined vs. Molded Polymer Bearings

Machined bearings are best for small production runs where tight tolerances and complex geometries are involved, and machining is ideal for prototypes, custom components, and specialty rotating equipment. This approach to manufacturing bearings also allows the material to remain homogenous with no molded-in stresses.

Molded bearings are the best option for high-volume production, and they are more cost-effective for simpler geometries. Molding also means reduced part-to-part variation; however, molded-in stress may be present, and there are limits to surface finish.

When choosing between machined and molded polymer bearings, the key factors are:

  • Geometry
  • Tolerances
  • Cost
  • Production volume

Nylon 66, PEEK, and PPS

Among the various options for polymer bearings are Nylon 66, PPS, and PEEK. The table below summarizes the differences between these materials.

Performance Comparison: Nylon 66 vs. PPS vs. PEEK

Property / FactorNylon 66PPSPEEK
Max Continuous Use Temperature~100–120°C~200–220°C~240–260°C
Wear ResistanceGood (improved with lubrication)Very goodExcellent (especially filled grades)
FrictionLowLowVery low
Moisture AbsorptionHigh (can swell, affects tolerances)Very lowVery low
Dimensional StabilityModerate (affected by humidity)HighVery high
Chemical ResistanceModerateExcellentExcellent
Mechanical StrengthGoodHighVery high
Impact ResistanceVery goodModerateGood
Creep ResistanceModerateGoodExcellent
PV CapabilityLow–MediumMedium–HighHigh–Very High
CostLowMediumHigh
Machining SuitabilityExcellentExcellentExcellent (best with filled grades)
MoldabilityExcellentGoodGood
Typical ApplicationsRollers, appliance bearings, automotive interior componentsPumps, compressors, chemical processing, precision housingsAerospace, oil & gas, high-speed bearings, semiconductor tools

Manufacturing Nylon 66, PEEK, and PPS Bearings

There are several different bearing materials available, but of interest in this blog post are Nylon 66, PPS, and PEEK bearings.

Nylon 66

Nylon 66 is very easy to mold because of its low viscosity, forging processing window, and good flow characteristics. However, there is going to be high mold shrinkage, which requires careful part design to keep warpage under control. Nylon also absorbs moisture, which means that drying is important before molding takes place. 

Nylon also machines easily, but its high ductility leads to stringy chips that necessitate the use of chip-breakers. Heat buildup is also an issue with nylon, and moisture absorption can impact the level of precision that can be achieved. It does, however, respond well to secondary machining on already molded parts, but does not work well with tight-tolerance CNC components.

PEEK

Because PEEK high a high melt temperature around 343°C, a very narrow thermal window that requires precision temperature control, and requires a heated mold, it is considered challenging to mold. However, with the right processing parameters and careful design, PPS can be molded and can manufacture parts with excellent thermal and mechanical performance (but is more expensive). 

PEEK is very difficult to machine. Its high modulus and hardness make it especially tough on cutting tools, and reinforced grades can be highly abrasive. It also generates an abundance of heat, thus requiring the use of coolants. However, machining PEEK supports excellent tolerances and surface finishes when the right combination of feed and speed is used. In fact, PEEK is frequently machined for low-volume aerospace and medical components.

PPS

PPS is not as easy to mold as Nylon 66 because its melt temperature is higher, it possesses a narrower processing window, and has high viscosity. However, it does exhibit very low shrinkage and excellent dimensional stability. PPS molding is very predictable and an excellent option once the right processing parameters have been figured out.

PPS is machinable, definitely more so than Nylon, but tends to be more brittle. It produces short chips and there is a risk of edge chipping during more aggressive cuts. On the other hand, it is good for tight tolerances. Note that filled grades of PPS can accelerate tool wear. Machining PPS is ideal for high-precision parts where dimensional stability is important.

Conclusion

Machined and molded Nylon 66, PPS, and PEEK bearings continue to gain traction because of properties such as low friction, wear characteristics, damping, corrosion resistance, and chemical compatibility. If you are in need of polymer bearings, Advanced EMC is here to help. Our team of engineers and bearing experts can help you from initial design to manufacturing to testing. Contact us today to learn more.