by Sara McCaslin Sara McCaslin No Comments

Kynar (PVDF) vs. PTFE: Choosing the Right Fluoropolymer for Fluid Handling Seals


A specification that simply calls out “flouropolymer” is quite incomplete. PVDF and PTFE are both fluoropolymers and grouped under that umbrella term, but they are quite different. When it comes to mechanical and chemical behavior, specifying the wrong material can lead to premature seal failure and expensive downtime. The objective of this blog post is to provide a clear, practical basis for determining which material is the most appropriate.

How PVDF and PTFE Are the Same

Both PVDF (Kynar) and PTFE (Teflon) resist a broad range of acids and solvents, and both handle highly elevated temperatures better than elastomers. They also share low coefficients of friction, low surface adhesion, and non-stick properties. And both have their own specialties in fluid-handling applications.

Where PVDF Pulls Ahead of PTFE 

PVDF (Polyvinylidene Fluoride) has distinct advantages over PTFE (Polytetrafluoroethylene). It exhibits better mechanical strength than PTFE (by about 2-3x) and has excellent abrasion resistance, which means it can hold up better under slurry or particulate-laden fluid flow. Wear resistance is another property of PVDF that excels over PTFE, especially in dynamic seal contact, such as wear sleeves and piston rings.  It also exhibits lower cold flow and creep under compression, which is very important for seal performance over time under sustained load. 

Finally, PTFE might be more expensive than the equivalent PVDF stock. While PTFE stock is inexpensive, PVDF is melt-processable. Being melt-processable can make PVDF vastly more cost-effective for high-volume molded parts.

Where PVDF Loses Against PTFE

PTFE has an extremely low coefficient of friction compared to PVDF (0.04-0.10 vs. 0.15-0.30). And in the presence of high-pH caustics and strong bases, PTFE performs without issue, whereas PVDF begins to degrade. There are also polar solvents, amines, fuming acids, and some ketones that attack PVDF’s chemical structure and polymer chain. PVDF’s chemical resistance chart has real gaps where PTFE’s is closer to “resistant to everything below its temp limit.” Always check material compatibility at your actual operating temperature, not ambient temperature. It is a fact that many “resistant” ratings degrade at elevated temperatures.

PVDF vs PTFE – Who Wins?

The table below summarizes the similarities and differences between PVDF and PTFE.

*Values are approximate; exact values are based on material grade and blend

* PVDF: Lower for high-volume molding; PTFE: Lower for machined stock

Decision framework

Here is a checklist for fluid handling engineers choosing between PVDF and PTFE:

  1. What’s touching the seal? Check for a strong base or problem solvent first; if it is present, PTFE wins outright
  2. Is there abrasive/particulate content or high dynamic wear? If so, lean toward PVDF if  the compatibility allows
  3. Is the seal under sustained compressive load where creep matters? If so, lean toward PVDF
  4. Static seal, clean chemistry, wide chemical exposure risk (multi-product lines, CIP/COP)? PTFE is the safer default.

The figures below show examples of where each material performs best.

Conclusion

Borderline cases with mixed process streams, elevated-temperature caustics, or unusual solvent blends are exactly where a materials engineer should get involved before committing to tooling. It is always cheaper to change a decision on paper than after seals are cut. Advanced EMC is here to help you choose the right material and seal for your fluid-handling challenges. And keep in mind that Advanced EMC offers several material options if neither material is a fit.

by Daniel Mays Daniel Mays No Comments

Designing Seals for Space Environments

Seals for space environments face a myriad of challenges. Space is one of the most unforgiving operating environments ever encountered by engineers. Seals that would be considered routine in terrestrial applications become mission-critical in space, where a single leak can mean the loss of a spacecraft, a payload, or a crew. This blog post examines the major sealing challenges presented by the space environment, along with the solutions best equipped to address them (including PTFE and PEEK seals).

Seals for Space Environments: Design Challenges

From extreme cryogenic temperatures to atomic oxygen, there are a host of factors to consider when engineering a sealing solution for space environments.

Extreme Temperature Ranges

Seals for space environments experience enormous thermal swings ranging from cryogenic temperatures in shadowed regions or propellant lines (as low as -450°F) to the intense heat experienced during atmospheric re-entry or sun-facing surfaces (+750°F). This poses a serious problem as most elastomers become brittle and crack at cryogenic temperatures, while at high temperatures they can experience hardening, outgassing, and loss of elasticity. These extremes add an extra layer of difficulty when designing effective, reliable seals or space environments. 

Spring-energized PTFE seals are an excellent solution here. The spring core maintains a highly consistent sealing force across the full thermal range, regardless of jacket expansion or contraction. For the most extreme high-temperature applications, a spring-energized Kalrez FFKM jacket will good superior heat resistance while still retaining the same self-energizing benefits for high-temperature sealing, but is not suitable for re-entry surfaces.

Vacuum and Outgassing

In hard vacuum conditions, most traditional seal materials are going to release trapped gases and plasticizers (outgassing). This leads to the potential for contaminated optics, sensors, and electronics, which can lead to catastrophic failure in many space applications. The seak materials used must possess a very low vapor pressure and minimal volatile content. To complicate things further, standard lubricants used to aid seal installation or reduce friction often evaporate entirely in a vacuum.

Both virgin PTFE and space-grade FFKM compounds are certified to NASA’s ASTM E595 outgassing standard. These materials are the preferred choices for vacuum applications as they offer exceptionally low vapor pressure and minimal volatile content. Spring-energized designs using these jackets also eliminate the need for installation lubricants, thus entirely removing another potential source of outgassing.

Radiation Exposure

In space, equipment is exposed to cosmic rays, solar particle events, and trapped radiation belt particles. These factors can quicly degrade the polymer chains in elastomers and plastics, causing major problems that include embrittlement, increased porosity, and loss of sealing performance over time. This potential for failure is especially severe in high-radiation orbits (e.g., near the Van Allen belts or at Jupiter).

PTFE offers improved radiation resistance compared to most elastomers, though prolonged exposure to high doses can still lead to material degradation. And PEEK can provide good performance for missions involving prolonged exposure to high doses of radiation.

Long Mission Life with No Maintenance

Unlike terrestrial seals that can be replaced, those used in space must often function for 10–30 years without any servicing. The lack of maintenance leads to a demand for near-zero wear and highly predictable aging behavior, both of which can be very difficult to validate on the ground. 

Spring-energized PTFE or PEEK seals have been found ideal for long-life missions, as the spring continuously compensates for material creep that would cause conventional elastomeric seals to lose contact stress over time. In addition, PTFE and PEEK seals also have extremely low friction, self-lubrication, and little to no stick-slip behavior. 

Mechanical Loads and Vibration

Launch seals will be exposed to incredibly intense acoustic and mechanical vibration, along with powerful shock loads and extreme acceleration. Seals for space environments must survive such a violent dynamic environment before even reaching the operating environment that was the primary target for the seals’ operating environment.

Spring-energized seals with glass-filled PTFE or PEEK jackets resist rolling, extrusion, and dislodgement under shock and vibration loading, and do so far better than convential O-ring designs.

Atomic Oxygen at LEO (Low Earth Orbit)

In LEO, the residual atomic oxygen in the upper atmosphere is highly reactive. It posseses the potential to aggressively erode many polymers (e.g., silicones, polyurethanes, etc.) resulting in the problematic thinning of seal cross-sections and the fast degradation of polymer surface properties.

PEEK offers significantly better resistance to atomic oxygen than many common polymers, though protective coatings may still be required for long-duration LEO exposure. PEEK’s dense aromatic backbone is significantly more resistant to atomic oxygen erosion than materials such as silicone, polyurethane, or virgin PTFE.

Micrometeorite and Debris Impact

Consider naturally occurring meteoroid particles that travel at extremely high speeds, and human-made orbital debris (often fragments from rocket bodies, collision ejecta, defunct satellites, and even paint flakes). Small particle impacts due to these types of debris can score or nick sealing surfaces, creating leak paths that are impossible to detect or repair once on orbit, and there are plenty of them in space. 

In the case of micrometeorite and debris impact, material selection helps, but system-level redundancy and shielding are critical. Carbon-filled PTFE or PEEK sealing solutions offer good surface hardness against glancing impacts and are best paired with a redundant dual spring-energized seal configuration with a monitored inter-seal cavity. 

Lubrication and Friction in Vacuum

Many seals rely on a thin fluid film to achieve low friction and reduced wear. However, in vacuum environments, conventional lubricants evaporate, which then leads to serious problems with stick-slip behavior and accelerated wear on dynamic seals (e.g., rotating joints on robotic arms or docking mechanisms).

PTFE’s inherently low coefficient of friction eliminates the need for additional lubrication in vacuum conditions.  In addition, carbon-filled or MoS₂-filled PTFE variants offer even lower friction for dynamic sealing applications. PEEK, including filled PEEK, also offers a very low coefficient of friction and self-lubrication, although not quite on the order of PTFE.

Material Selection Constraints

The combination of the above factors inevitably narrows the list of acceptable materials drastically. Traditional sealing material choices such as nitrile rubber are often ruled out, pushing engineers toward high-performance engineering polymers such as PTFE or Viton, as well as spring-energized polymer seals.

Spring-energized seals with PTFE or PEEK jackets (with filled grades selected to target specific performance gaps) represent the most versatile and broadly applicable solution across all space sealing challenges.

Summary of Seals for Space Design Challenges

Below is a summary of some of the key issues related to seals in space, along with some suggested solutions.

ChallengeKey issueSuggested solution(s)
Extreme temperaturesElastomers crack at cryogenic temps or degrade at high heatSpring-energized PTFE seals; Kalrez FFKM jacket for high-heat applications
Vacuum & outgassingMaterials release gases that contaminate optics and sensorsVirgin PTFE or space-grade FFKM (NASA ASTM E595 certified)
Radiation exposurePolymer chain degradation, embrittlement, increased porosityPTFE (moderate doses); PEEK (high-dose / long-duration missions)
Long mission lifeNo maintenance possible; seals must last 10–30 yearsSpring-energized PTFE or PEEK, pring continuously compensates for material creep
Vibration & shockIntense launch loads can dislodge or extrude sealsGlass-filled PTFE or PEEK spring-energized seals
Atomic oxygen (LEO)Reactive oxygen aggressively erodes many polymersPEEK, dense aromatic backbone resists erosion; protective coatings for long durations
Micrometeorite impactDebris scoring creates irreparable leak paths on orbitCarbon-filled PTFE or PEEK + redundant dual spring-energized seal with monitored inter-seal cavity
Vacuum lubricationConventional lubricants evaporate in vacuum, causing wearPTFE (self-lubricating); carbon- or MoS₂-filled PTFE variants for dynamic seals

Conclusion

Each challenge outlined in this blog post is demanding on its own. When combined, they eliminate most conventional sealing solutions entirely. What consistently emerges from these challenges is a short list of solutions built around spring-energized seal architectures and/or high-performance PTFE and PEEK. Together, they offer the broadest combination of thermal stability, radiation tolerance, and mechanical robustness available today.

If you are tasked with designing seals for space environments, contact Advanced EMC today.