by Sara McCaslin, PhD Sara McCaslin, PhD No Comments

Designing Seals for Space Environments

Seals for space environments face a myriad of challenges. Space is one of the most unforgiving operating environments ever encountered by engineers. Seals that would be considered routine in terrestrial applications become mission-critical in space, where a single leak can mean the loss of a spacecraft, a payload, or a crew. This blog post examines the major sealing challenges presented by the space environment, along with the solutions best equipped to address them (including PTFE and PEEK seals).

Seals for Space Environments: Design Challenges

From extreme cryogenic temperatures to atomic oxygen, there are a host of factors to consider when engineering a sealing solution for space environments.

Extreme Temperature Ranges

Seals for space environments experience enormous thermal swings ranging from cryogenic temperatures in shadowed regions or propellant lines (as low as -450°F) to the intense heat experienced during atmospheric re-entry or sun-facing surfaces (+750°F). This poses a serious problem as most elastomers become brittle and crack at cryogenic temperatures, while at high temperatures they can experience hardening, outgassing, and loss of elasticity. These extremes add an extra layer of difficulty when designing effective, reliable seals or space environments. 

Spring-energized PTFE seals are an excellent solution here. The spring core maintains a highly consistent sealing force across the full thermal range, regardless of jacket expansion or contraction. For the most extreme high-temperature applications, a spring-energized Kalrez FFKM jacket will good superior heat resistance while still retaining the same self-energizing benefits for high-temperature sealing, but is not suitable for re-entry surfaces.

Vacuum and Outgassing

In hard vacuum conditions, most traditional seal materials are going to release trapped gases and plasticizers (outgassing). This leads to the potential for contaminated optics, sensors, and electronics, which can lead to catastrophic failure in many space applications. The seak materials used must possess a very low vapor pressure and minimal volatile content. To complicate things further, standard lubricants used to aid seal installation or reduce friction often evaporate entirely in a vacuum.

Both virgin PTFE and space-grade FFKM compounds are certified to NASA’s ASTM E595 outgassing standard. These materials are the preferred choices for vacuum applications as they offer exceptionally low vapor pressure and minimal volatile content. Spring-energized designs using these jackets also eliminate the need for installation lubricants, thus entirely removing another potential source of outgassing.

Radiation Exposure

In space, equipment is exposed to cosmic rays, solar particle events, and trapped radiation belt particles. These factors can quicly degrade the polymer chains in elastomers and plastics, causing major problems that include embrittlement, increased porosity, and loss of sealing performance over time. This potential for failure is especially severe in high-radiation orbits (e.g., near the Van Allen belts or at Jupiter).

PTFE offers improved radiation resistance compared to most elastomers, though prolonged exposure to high doses can still lead to material degradation. And PEEK can provide good performance for missions involving prolonged exposure to high doses of radiation.

Long Mission Life with No Maintenance

Unlike terrestrial seals that can be replaced, those used in space must often function for 10–30 years without any servicing. The lack of maintenance leads to a demand for near-zero wear and highly predictable aging behavior, both of which can be very difficult to validate on the ground. 

Spring-energized PTFE or PEEK seals have been found ideal for long-life missions, as the spring continuously compensates for material creep that would cause conventional elastomeric seals to lose contact stress over time. In addition, PTFE and PEEK seals also have extremely low friction, self-lubrication, and little to no stick-slip behavior. 

Mechanical Loads and Vibration

Launch seals will be exposed to incredibly intense acoustic and mechanical vibration, along with powerful shock loads and extreme acceleration. Seals for space environments must survive such a violent dynamic environment before even reaching the operating environment that was the primary target for the seals’ operating environment.

Spring-energized seals with glass-filled PTFE or PEEK jackets resist rolling, extrusion, and dislodgement under shock and vibration loading, and do so far better than convential O-ring designs.

Atomic Oxygen at LEO (Low Earth Orbit)

In LEO, the residual atomic oxygen in the upper atmosphere is highly reactive. It posseses the potential to aggressively erode many polymers (e.g., silicones, polyurethanes, etc.) resulting in the problematic thinning of seal cross-sections and the fast degradation of polymer surface properties.

PEEK offers significantly better resistance to atomic oxygen than many common polymers, though protective coatings may still be required for long-duration LEO exposure. PEEK’s dense aromatic backbone is significantly more resistant to atomic oxygen erosion than materials such as silicone, polyurethane, or virgin PTFE.

Micrometeorite and Debris Impact

Consider naturally occurring meteoroid particles that travel at extremely high speeds, and human-made orbital debris (often fragments from rocket bodies, collision ejecta, defunct satellites, and even paint flakes). Small particle impacts due to these types of debris can score or nick sealing surfaces, creating leak paths that are impossible to detect or repair once on orbit, and there are plenty of them in space. 

In the case of micrometeorite and debris impact, material selection helps, but system-level redundancy and shielding are critical. Carbon-filled PTFE or PEEK sealing solutions offer good surface hardness against glancing impacts and are best paired with a redundant dual spring-energized seal configuration with a monitored inter-seal cavity. 

Lubrication and Friction in Vacuum

Many seals rely on a thin fluid film to achieve low friction and reduced wear. However, in vacuum environments, conventional lubricants evaporate, which then leads to serious problems with stick-slip behavior and accelerated wear on dynamic seals (e.g., rotating joints on robotic arms or docking mechanisms).

PTFE’s inherently low coefficient of friction eliminates the need for additional lubrication in vacuum conditions.  In addition, carbon-filled or MoS₂-filled PTFE variants offer even lower friction for dynamic sealing applications. PEEK, including filled PEEK, also offers a very low coefficient of friction and self-lubrication, although not quite on the order of PTFE.

Material Selection Constraints

The combination of the above factors inevitably narrows the list of acceptable materials drastically. Traditional sealing material choices such as nitrile rubber are often ruled out, pushing engineers toward high-performance engineering polymers such as PTFE or Viton, as well as spring-energized polymer seals.

Spring-energized seals with PTFE or PEEK jackets (with filled grades selected to target specific performance gaps) represent the most versatile and broadly applicable solution across all space sealing challenges.

Summary of Seals for Space Design Challenges

Below is a summary of some of the key issues related to seals in space, along with some suggested solutions.

ChallengeKey issueSuggested solution(s)
Extreme temperaturesElastomers crack at cryogenic temps or degrade at high heatSpring-energized PTFE seals; Kalrez FFKM jacket for high-heat applications
Vacuum & outgassingMaterials release gases that contaminate optics and sensorsVirgin PTFE or space-grade FFKM (NASA ASTM E595 certified)
Radiation exposurePolymer chain degradation, embrittlement, increased porosityPTFE (moderate doses); PEEK (high-dose / long-duration missions)
Long mission lifeNo maintenance possible; seals must last 10–30 yearsSpring-energized PTFE or PEEK, pring continuously compensates for material creep
Vibration & shockIntense launch loads can dislodge or extrude sealsGlass-filled PTFE or PEEK spring-energized seals
Atomic oxygen (LEO)Reactive oxygen aggressively erodes many polymersPEEK, dense aromatic backbone resists erosion; protective coatings for long durations
Micrometeorite impactDebris scoring creates irreparable leak paths on orbitCarbon-filled PTFE or PEEK + redundant dual spring-energized seal with monitored inter-seal cavity
Vacuum lubricationConventional lubricants evaporate in vacuum, causing wearPTFE (self-lubricating); carbon- or MoS₂-filled PTFE variants for dynamic seals

Conclusion

Each challenge outlined in this blog post is demanding on its own. When combined, they eliminate most conventional sealing solutions entirely. What consistently emerges from these challenges is a short list of solutions built around spring-energized seal architectures and/or high-performance PTFE and PEEK. Together, they offer the broadest combination of thermal stability, radiation tolerance, and mechanical robustness available today.

If you are tasked with designing seals for space environments, contact Advanced EMC today. 

by Sara McCaslin, PhD Sara McCaslin, PhD No Comments

The PTFE Spring-Energized Seal as a Casualty: Why Hardware and Installation Are the Real Killers

A seal rarely fails in isolation, but this is often forgotten.  When leakage occurs, the immediate reaction is often to blame the seal itself. However, this approach frequently addresses the symptom rather than the disease. In many failure analyses, the seal is the casualty of a compromised environment. 

High-performance spring-energized seals do not function in an environment by themselves. Rather, they are dynamic elements within a complex mechanical system that continuously react to issues in hardware, surface finish, alignment, pressure, and thermal cycling. When these boundary conditions drift outside their engineering limits, even the most advanced spring-energized seal will inevitably fail.

To achieve genuine reliability, the conversation must shift from “seal failure” to “system integrity.”

The Tribological System

A spring-energized seal is more than a polymer ring with a metallic energizer: it is a critical component of a tribological system. As such, its performance can be directly linked to three factors:

  • Gland Design: Dimensions, geometric tolerances, and extrusion gaps
  • Counterface: Material hardness, coating integrity, and surface finish
  • Operational Physics: Thermal expansion coefficients (CTE), pressure-induced hardware deflection, and friction-generated heat

Each factor impacts the contact stress profile and wear mechanics, which means if one element is ignored, the seal attempts to compensate until the application’s physics overwhelm it.

Gland Geometry for Spring-Energized Seals

The gland design sets the boundary conditions for the spring-energized seal’s life.

Radial Squeeze & Contact Stress: A lack of compression can lead to the formation of spiral leakage pathways in dynamic applications, while excessive interference generates frictional heat and accelerates natural abrasive wear. For spring-energized designs, the incorrect squeeze distorts the energizer’s force-deflection curve, essentially voiding the design that went into the spring.

Groove Volumetrics: A groove that is too wide allows axial shuttling, where the shaft and seal move axially. This leads to a tilted seal and skewed loading profiles. In addition, a groove that violates fill percentage guidelines restricts thermal expansion, causing stress spikes.

Extrusion Gap Mechanics: Under high pressure, PTFE will exhibit cold flow behavior (which is a material property, not a defect). If the extrusion gap (E-gap) is excessive or expands due to hardware pressure breathing, the polymer will extrude into the clearance. In addition, hardware features like lead-in chamfers are critical. A sharp corner acts as a cutting tool during installation, shaving the seal before it ever sees service pressure.

Surface Finish: The Micro-Interface

Surface finish is far too often the silent killer in dynamic applications. It is not enough to specify smooth, but rather define the correct surface finish required for effective film transfer when using materials such as PTFE or PEEK. Keep in mind that PTFE seals rely on the deposition of a thin transfer film onto the mating hardware to stabilize friction. If the counterface is too rough, it abrades the seal lip. On the other hand, if the surface is a mirror polish, it will prevent lubricant retention or film adhesion, leading to serious issues related to high stick-slip friction. The shaft hardness must also support the load: a soft shaft can suffer from galling or scoring, while a delaminating coating means a jagged, abrasive interface that destroys the seal lip.

Thermal and Mechanical Instability

Polymers and metals behave differently thermally. For example, PTFE is going to expand significantly more than steel given the same temperature differential. If such a CTE mismatch is ignored, rising temperatures can cause the seal to overfill the gland, resulting in higher friction and torque. However, when the PTFE spring-energized seal is subject to cryogenic temperature, it may shrink away from the bore and lose contact stress unless the spring energizer is correctly sized to compensate for this dimensional change.

Mechanically, pressure is not static. Housings breathe, bores distort, and bolts stretch. In cyclic applications, the extrusion gap is a dynamic variable that opens and closes with every pressure spike. This forces the seal to fatigue as it continuously reshapes itself to bridge the changing gap.

Misalignment and Eccentricity

Runout and misalignment are simply unavoidable with a rotary shaft seal for several reasons. Eccentric forces on one side of the seal lead to high compression, while the opposite side of the seal lifts off, losing critical contact. This, in turn, results in localized wear patterns and half-moon extrusion failures. Often, the seal is expected to mask bearing slop or structural deflection, which is actually a band-aid for mechanical instability that should have been resolved at the design stage.

Installation of Spring-Energized Seals

Many seals are destroyed before the machine is even turned on. Installation is a violent event for a simple polymer ring. Forcing a seal to go over threads, sharp shoulders, or through undersized bores can slice the polymer jacket or permanently deform the spring energizer, neither of which is good. Installation can destroy a seal before it has had a chance to perform.

Conclusion

Leakage is not solely a material failure. This thought process ignores the complex interplay of gland geometry, surface finish, and thermal dynamics that dictate performance. Trueseal solution reliability requires moving beyond component replacement and embracing a holistic approach to system integrity.

At Advanced EMC, we engineer tribological solutions. If you need help navigating complex boundary conditions or recurring failures with your PTFE spring-energized seals, let our engineers help you analyze the total application. Contact us today to design a sealing system built for your specific operational situation.