by Sara McCaslin, PhD Sara McCaslin, PhD No Comments

PTFE Seal Solutions for EV Battery Cooling Systems

As EVs (Electric Vehicles) push toward longer range, faster charging, and higher energy density, thermal management has become one of the most significant engineering challenges in the industry. Battery packs generate heat during their charge and discharge cycles. Keeping battery cell temperatures within a narrow operating band is critical not just to performance but also to longevity and safety. At the center of the cooling system are the seals that keep coolant where it belongs. 

Choosing the right seal material is not a minor detail, as it directly impacts warranty exposure, system reliability, and platform longevity. And PTFE (Polytetrafluoroethylene) has emerged as one of the most effective seal materials for EV battery cooling applications, and for good reason.

The Challenges of the EV Battery Cooling Environment

The current trend in coolant for EV battery cooling systems is immersion cooling with synthetic dielectric fluids for high-performance and fast-charging applications (800V architectures), since they allow much faster heat removal. However, for most mass-market EVs, glycol/water mixture (WEG) in cold-plate systems remains the most commonly used due to cost and simplicity.

The chemistry of glycol/water coolant is extremely aggressive toward a number of materials. Common issues that can develop include:

  • Galvanic corrosion can occur where dissimilar metals meet
  • Coolant pH drops and becomes acidic as the inhibitor package depletes
  • Coolant degradation generates glycolic and oxalic acids
  • Degraded coolant loses thermal efficiency
  • Seal compression set
  • Vibration-induced fatigue at fittings and crimped connections
  • Thermal cycling causes repeated expansion/contraction
  • Even a small internal leak can be catastrophic since coolant contacting cells can cause short circuits or thermal runaway
  • Off-gassing from degraded coolant or seals

Seals intended for battery cooling systems are exposed to a wide operating temperature range of -40°C to 150°C. They are also exposed to pressure cycling and vibration in battery thermal loops. Finally, they have long service life expectations (150k–200k miles).

Why PTFE Performs Well for EV Battery Cooling Systems

PTFE is the most chemically inert polymer on the market, and that means it is resistant to the chemical effects of glycol-based coolants, especially as they degrade. It also has extremely low friction, which has a positive impact on pump efficiency and reduces seal wear (extending the life of the battery system). While PTFE is subject to creep, that can be addressed through the judicious use of common fillers (e.g., carbon fiber, graphite, glass). 

PTFE liners and gaskets can electrically isolate dissimilar metals, interrupting the galvanic cell and preventing galvanic corrosion. As just alluded to, it is chemically inert across virtually the entire pH spectrum (pH 0–14). While acidic coolants attack rubber seals or metal surfaces, they have essentially no effect on PTFE. This inertness makes it a stable sealing material even in neglected systems. In addition, PTFE does not react with glycolic or oxalic acid. This means that seal integrity is maintained even as the coolant degrades. 

While PTFE does not directly restore thermal efficiency, it does not shed any type of degradation byproducts into the coolant. This is an excellent feature, as it avoids contributing particulate or chemical contamination that reduces efficiency or fouls the cold plate channels. In addition, PTFE is thermally stable up to about 260°C and does not off-gas meaningful volatile compounds under normal or even moderately elevated operating conditions.

PTFE does have a very low creep resistance, which is actually a weakness when it comes to EV battery cooling systems. It is prone to cold flow under sustained load and does not recover well. However, this is typically managed by pairing PTFE with a spring energizer or backing elastomer to maintain a consistent sealing force over time. 

Its low friction coefficient means it does not transmit vibrational micro-movement into fretting or abrasive wear at interfaces the way harder materials might. PTFE-lined fittings also tend to dampen rather than amplify vibration stress at the sealing face.

PTFE has a relatively high coefficient of thermal expansion, which is a known limitation. However, its expansion is highly consistent and predictable. When properly designed as a joint with appropriate preload, it accommodates cycling without cracking or permanent deformation.

Its low permeability and chemical stability mean it is less likely to develop micro-leaks or weep paths, and reducing seal-originated leak risk is highly significant in a battery pack where any coolant ingress near the battery cells is a serious safety event. 

PTFE Seal Types Used in EV Thermal Management

The three most common types of PTFE seals are spring-energized seals for rotary and reciprocating pumps, lip seals for coolant circulation systems, and gaskets and diaphragms for valve and manifold assemblies. 

In a spring-energized seal, a metal spring compensates for PTFE’s cold-flow tendency by maintaining a consistent sealing pressure. This pressure is maintained even when subject to temperature cycling and acidic coolant conditions. PTFE lip seals, in addition to PTFE’s other features, provide extremely low friction and are self-lubricating. 

Finally, expanded PTFE gaskets will conform under bolt load across dissimilar metal flanges, all while resisting chemical attack. In fact, PTFE diaphragms provide an inert barrier that protects valve internals from coolant and prevents degradation products from entering the fluid.

Unfilled vs Filled PTFE

Unfilled PTFE (also referred to as virgin PTFE) has some serious limitations, like creep and wear. Because of this, unfilled PTFE is rarely used for seals unless it is for a static application. However, the use of additive fillers can address those issues and further enhance the performance of PTFE. Fillers can improve wear life, reduce creep, and increase stiffness, as well as introduce electrical conductivity. The drawback of fillers is that their use can compromise the natural chemical resistance of PTFE. 

Glass, for example, reduces creep, increases compressive strength, and reduces how much PTFE deforms under compressive loads. It is, however, abrasive and is a poor choice for rotary applications or alkaline environments. To achieve the lowest friction of any PTFE compound, PI (Polyimide) is used. It also enhances wear and abrasion resistance and works extremely well in dry-running applications. 

Carbon additives also increase compressive strength, but also enhance thermal conductivity, wear resistance, and hardness. Graphite, which is a crystal-modified high-purity carbon, decreases friction and increases the load-carrying capabilities of PTFE.

Carbon-filled and carbon/graphite blends are the most common choices for EV cooling seal specifications because they offer the best overall balance of wear life, chemical compatibility with glycol/water, and creep resistance. Glass-filled grades are the typical fallback where higher stiffness is needed.

Conclusion

Battery cooling systems are a critical aspect of EV functionality. And for those systems to do their job, they need seals that are reliable and engineered for harsh environments. Filled PTFE has risen to the top as one of the materials of choice for spring-energized seals, lip seals, gaskets, and diaphragms. To learn more about the options available for coolant systems, contact the seal experts at Advanced EMC today.

by Sara McCaslin, PhD Sara McCaslin, PhD No Comments

The PTFE Spring-Energized Seal as a Casualty: Why Hardware and Installation Are the Real Killers

A seal rarely fails in isolation, but this is often forgotten.  When leakage occurs, the immediate reaction is often to blame the seal itself. However, this approach frequently addresses the symptom rather than the disease. In many failure analyses, the seal is the casualty of a compromised environment. 

High-performance spring-energized seals do not function in an environment by themselves. Rather, they are dynamic elements within a complex mechanical system that continuously react to issues in hardware, surface finish, alignment, pressure, and thermal cycling. When these boundary conditions drift outside their engineering limits, even the most advanced spring-energized seal will inevitably fail.

To achieve genuine reliability, the conversation must shift from “seal failure” to “system integrity.”

The Tribological System

A spring-energized seal is more than a polymer ring with a metallic energizer: it is a critical component of a tribological system. As such, its performance can be directly linked to three factors:

  • Gland Design: Dimensions, geometric tolerances, and extrusion gaps
  • Counterface: Material hardness, coating integrity, and surface finish
  • Operational Physics: Thermal expansion coefficients (CTE), pressure-induced hardware deflection, and friction-generated heat

Each factor impacts the contact stress profile and wear mechanics, which means if one element is ignored, the seal attempts to compensate until the application’s physics overwhelm it.

Gland Geometry for Spring-Energized Seals

The gland design sets the boundary conditions for the spring-energized seal’s life.

Radial Squeeze & Contact Stress: A lack of compression can lead to the formation of spiral leakage pathways in dynamic applications, while excessive interference generates frictional heat and accelerates natural abrasive wear. For spring-energized designs, the incorrect squeeze distorts the energizer’s force-deflection curve, essentially voiding the design that went into the spring.

Groove Volumetrics: A groove that is too wide allows axial shuttling, where the shaft and seal move axially. This leads to a tilted seal and skewed loading profiles. In addition, a groove that violates fill percentage guidelines restricts thermal expansion, causing stress spikes.

Extrusion Gap Mechanics: Under high pressure, PTFE will exhibit cold flow behavior (which is a material property, not a defect). If the extrusion gap (E-gap) is excessive or expands due to hardware pressure breathing, the polymer will extrude into the clearance. In addition, hardware features like lead-in chamfers are critical. A sharp corner acts as a cutting tool during installation, shaving the seal before it ever sees service pressure.

Surface Finish: The Micro-Interface

Surface finish is far too often the silent killer in dynamic applications. It is not enough to specify smooth, but rather define the correct surface finish required for effective film transfer when using materials such as PTFE or PEEK. Keep in mind that PTFE seals rely on the deposition of a thin transfer film onto the mating hardware to stabilize friction. If the counterface is too rough, it abrades the seal lip. On the other hand, if the surface is a mirror polish, it will prevent lubricant retention or film adhesion, leading to serious issues related to high stick-slip friction. The shaft hardness must also support the load: a soft shaft can suffer from galling or scoring, while a delaminating coating means a jagged, abrasive interface that destroys the seal lip.

Thermal and Mechanical Instability

Polymers and metals behave differently thermally. For example, PTFE is going to expand significantly more than steel given the same temperature differential. If such a CTE mismatch is ignored, rising temperatures can cause the seal to overfill the gland, resulting in higher friction and torque. However, when the PTFE spring-energized seal is subject to cryogenic temperature, it may shrink away from the bore and lose contact stress unless the spring energizer is correctly sized to compensate for this dimensional change.

Mechanically, pressure is not static. Housings breathe, bores distort, and bolts stretch. In cyclic applications, the extrusion gap is a dynamic variable that opens and closes with every pressure spike. This forces the seal to fatigue as it continuously reshapes itself to bridge the changing gap.

Misalignment and Eccentricity

Runout and misalignment are simply unavoidable with a rotary shaft seal for several reasons. Eccentric forces on one side of the seal lead to high compression, while the opposite side of the seal lifts off, losing critical contact. This, in turn, results in localized wear patterns and half-moon extrusion failures. Often, the seal is expected to mask bearing slop or structural deflection, which is actually a band-aid for mechanical instability that should have been resolved at the design stage.

Installation of Spring-Energized Seals

Many seals are destroyed before the machine is even turned on. Installation is a violent event for a simple polymer ring. Forcing a seal to go over threads, sharp shoulders, or through undersized bores can slice the polymer jacket or permanently deform the spring energizer, neither of which is good. Installation can destroy a seal before it has had a chance to perform.

Conclusion

Leakage is not solely a material failure. This thought process ignores the complex interplay of gland geometry, surface finish, and thermal dynamics that dictate performance. Trueseal solution reliability requires moving beyond component replacement and embracing a holistic approach to system integrity.

At Advanced EMC, we engineer tribological solutions. If you need help navigating complex boundary conditions or recurring failures with your PTFE spring-energized seals, let our engineers help you analyze the total application. Contact us today to design a sealing system built for your specific operational situation.