by Sara McCaslin Sara McCaslin No Comments

Canted Coil Springs and SWaP: A Mechanical Answer to Mobility Device Design Constraints

Modern mobility devices demand a constant balancing act: adding capability without adding size, weight, or power draw. Canted coil springs, however, offer a simple mechanical answer to problems that might otherwise require bulkier, power-hungry systems. This article explores how they support SWaP goals across mobility device design.

Canted Coil Springs

A canted coil spring is a type of coiled spring where the individual coils are tilted (canted) at an angle relative to the spring’s axis, rather than sitting perpendicular to it as in a standard coil spring. Unlike most conventional springs, canted coil springs are also wound with an elliptical (oval), rather than round, cross-section, which is a structural detail that, combined with the coil angle, produces their signature load-deflection behavior.

Canted geometry gives these springs a distinctive load-deflection curve: they can provide a nearly constant force over a wide range of deflection. This is unlike conventional springs, where force rises roughly linearly with compression. Because each coil deflects independently, the spring also compensates for wear, misalignment, and tolerance stack-up over its service life rather than losing contact force as mating surfaces change.

Because of this near-constant-force property, their ability to conform to irregular surfaces, and their independent-coil construction, canted coil springs are widely used for fastening and latching, electrical connectors, and EMI shielding. They’re typically manufactured in 300-series stainless steel, Hastelloy, Inconel, Elgiloy, or copper alloys, with Elgiloy generally specified where extreme temperatures or corrosive media are a factor, and can be gold-, silver-, or nickel-plated for electrical or semiconductor applications.

SWaP and Mobility

SWaP stands for Size (or Space), Weight, and Power, three critical constraints engineers must optimize when designing modern electronic and mechanical systems, including mobility devices.

A mobility device is any tool or piece of equipment engineered to help someone move around, maintain balance, or perform physical activities they would otherwise have difficulty with due to injury, disability, illness, or age-related limitations. There are a wide variety of such devices, including canes, crutches, walkers, wheelchairs (manual and powered), mobility scooters, gait trainers, and stairlifts.

For mobility devices, optimizing SWaP means engineers are working to build lighter, more compact equipment that maximizes battery life and maneuverability without sacrificing performance.

Canted Coil Springs and SWaP

Canted coil springs, which feature individual coils set at a slanted angle, are versatile components that may help reduce size, weight, and/or power draw in certain mobility-device subassemblies. The examples below are candidate applications based on the springs’ established engineering behavior. They illustrate where the technology’s known strengths are likely to translate well to mobility hardware, not documented case studies specific to this market.

Impact on Size

Canted coil springs support the Size constraint in SWaP because their compact radial cross-section can deliver meaningful force in a much smaller envelope than many conventional springs or actuators. They can also be integrated directly into joints, connectors, or latch mechanisms without a separate housing.

Candidate applications include compact latch mechanisms for folding wheelchair frames or walkers, where available hardware space is highly constrained; miniature multi-point electrical contacts in joystick-style controllers; space-constrained connector interfaces between battery packs and drive systems in mobility aids; and small-envelope detent mechanisms for adjustable cane or crutch height-locking pins.

Impact on Weight

Canted coil spring solutions are lightweight (and generally less complex) compared to hydraulic or motor-driven mechanisms that might otherwise be needed to achieve similar constant-force behavior.

There are several candidate applications where canted coil springs could help reduce weight. As the detent element in a stepped seat-back recline lock for manual wheelchairs, a canted coil spring could provide reliable, wear-compensating engagement at each locking position. This is a lighter-weight alternative to a heavier ratchet mechanism, though a spring alone is not a substitute for a hydraulic damper where controlled, velocity-dependent recline motion is required for safety. 

Canted coil springs may also be well suited as the detent spring in wheelchair quick-release axles, where their independent-coil design could better compensate for wear and tolerance changes over repeated cycles than a conventional single coil spring, improving reliability without adding weight or part count. Finally, they can provide lightweight EMI shielding in onboard electronics for power scooters, potentially replacing heavier shielding gaskets.

An older woman on a mobility scooter
An older woman on a mobility scooter

Impact on Power

Canted coil springs are purely mechanical, passive components: they draw no power of their own. In electrical-contact applications, such as spring-energized connector contacts between battery and motor interfaces, the only associated loss is minor resistive (I²R) loss at the contact interface, which is negligible compared to the power draw of an active switching or motor-driven alternative. Because the constant-force characteristic requires no active control system or feedback loop to maintain consistent pressure or engagement, canted coil springs can serve locking mechanisms, seating adjustments, and connector contacts without consuming any of a device’s power budget.

Because of this, canted coil springs can enable passive constant-force seating-pressure adjustment, avoiding motorized actuators in cushioning systems. They can also support mechanical (non-electric) locking pins for folding walkers and rollators, preserving battery life for onboard electronics. As spring-energized electrical connector contacts in battery-to-motor interfaces, they maintain reliable contact without active control circuitry. And when used as passive brake or wheel-lock engagement springs in manual wheelchairs, they require no power source to maintain holding force.

There’s also an indirect power benefit: because canted coil solutions are lighter than the hydraulic or motorized systems they can replace, they reduce the overall mass a powered mobility device has to move to improve battery efficiency and range.

Secondary SWaP-Adjacent Benefits

The ability of canted coil springs to conform to irregular or moving surfaces reduces the need for precision-machined mating parts, simplifying manufacturing and reducing part count. Their independent-coil design also means individual coils continue to compensate for wear and misalignment throughout the product’s service life, which can reduce the maintenance burden in applications like wheelchair wheel-lock and brake engagement points.

This durability is directly tied to material selection: canted coil springs made from 300-series stainless steel, Hastelloy, or Elgiloy are engineered to resist a wide range of temperatures and corrosive or humid conditions, which is relevant for mobility devices such as outdoor scooters and rollators that see regular exposure to the elements.

Conclusion

Canted coil springs can offer a low-complexity way to help meet SWaP objectives. Their passive operation, small footprint, and durable, self-compensating design make them a strong candidate for replacing motorized or hydraulic solutions in specific mobility-device subassemblies (provided the application doesn’t require the velocity-dependent damping or continuously variable control that only an active system can provide). These springs are well worth considering in the next mobility device design. If you’d like to learn more about Advanced EMC FlexForce canted coil springs, contact us today

by Sara McCaslin Sara McCaslin No Comments

Ball Valve Seats: How Seat Material Impacts Valve Life and Leak Rate

Ball valve seats are critical in industrial fluid control applications. While the valve body and ball are crucial to the design as well, the seat is responsible for sealing the fluid and achieving a uniformly distributed seating stress. That is why poorly specified valve seat materials can lead to leaks, pressure drops, and catastrophic failure. 

As an engineer, if you are looking for a reliable seal with a long service life, it is extremely important to match the chemical and mechanical properties of ball valve seats to the specific operating environment, including temperature, pressure, and media compatibility. The objective of this blog post is to review the materials, including their major properties, benefits, and drawbacks, and take a quick look at how to choose the right one. 

The Engineering Mechanics and Key Properties of Ball Valve Seats

Soft-seated ball valves depend on the combined elasticity and ductility of polymers to conform to the shape of the ball, leading to a leak-proof seal. As a result, there are some essential material properties that engineers must take into account:

  • Low Coefficient of Friction: Low friction will minimize stem torque, which in turn prevents excessive wear and tear that leads to leaks and potentially catastrophic failure.
  • Dimensional Stability & Low Thermal Expansion: This combination ensures the seat retains its shape during temperature fluctuations, which is vital for preventing leaks.
  • Stress Recovery: Stress recovery is the material’s ability to bounce back (return to its original shape) after continuous cycling and compression.

Common Failure Modes Driving Leakage and Lifespan Reduction

There are three common failure modes associated with ball valve seats. These modes drive leakage and lead to a reduced lifespan.

Cold Flow (Creep)

Solid materials slowly deform under continuous mechanical stress in a phenomenon called creep. Over time, this creeping action deteriorates valve performance and breaks the seal. The result is ball valve failure.

Excessive Friction and Torque

Elevated temperatures can increase pressure between the seat and the ball, leading to high friction. High friction leads to higher torque demands, which can ultimately tear the ball valve seats apart and lock the valve.

Permeation and “Popcorning”

Describe how gases and monomers (like butadiene) can penetrate the polymer at a molecular level. Explain how this causes the seat material to swell, blister, or undergo “popcorn polymerization,” leading to catastrophic leakage and seat destruction.

PTFE vs. PEEK for Ball Valve Seats

Two of the most common material choices for ball valve seats are PTFE and PEEK. 

Virgin and Filled PTFE (Polytetrafluoroethylene)

Virgin and filled PTFE offer unmatched chemical compatibility, along with the lowest coefficient of friction, self-lubrication, and dry running. They also perform very well in temperatures from cryogenic temperatures down to −330°F  up to 400°F–550°F. However, PTFE is highly susceptible to cold creep and radiation damage, so keep in mind that it is not a global solution. At the same time, adding glass or carbon graphite to PTFE not only reduces cold flow but also improves wear and extrusion resistance in high-pressure applications.

PEEK (Polyetheretherketone)

PEEK is another potential option. It has good chemical compatibility, low friction, and self-lubrication combined with excellent mechanical strength and good rigidity. PEEK works extremely well in high-pressure, high-temperature (480°F, continuous and up to 600°F) environments. It’s also unaffected by continuous steam/hot water exposure and is highly resistant to radiation. However, it becomes brittle at low temperatures (making it a poor choice for cryogenic temperatures) and is susceptible to concentrated sulfuric acid and certain highly oxidizing acids. It also requires a higher stem torque than PTFE solutions because its friction, although low, is still higher than PTFE.

PCTFE Ball Valve Seats for Low Permeation Applications

Advanced Material Solutions for Niche and Critical Applications

PCTFE (Polychlorotrifluoroethylene)

PCTFE is known for its performance in low-permeation applications. It has a highly dense molecular structure and low microporosity that make it virtually immune to issues with swelling and popcorning. PCTFE maintains mechanical properties down to −400°F, making it ideal for cryogenic applications, and it also works well in semiconductor applications requiring low outgassing. It also exhibits excellent radiation resistance.

TFM (Modified PTFE)

TFM is a second-generation PTFE that offers a much denser molecular structure, allowing it to deliver the chemical resistance of standard PTFE combined with significantly better stress recovery, reduced cold flow, and lower porosity.

Acetal (Delrin) and UHMW-PE

Acetal provides extreme rigidity, high abrasion resistance, and cold flow resistance at pressures up to 5,000 psi and performs quite well in radioactive environments (but should not be used with Oxygen flow). Its primary limitation is its temperature range: −70°F to 180°F. UHMW-PE has specialized low-level radiation resistance and works well with highly abrasive media.

valve seat failure

Choosing the Right Material for Ball Valve Seats

MaterialTemp RangeBest ForWatch Out For
PTFE (Virgin)Cryogenic to 400°FBroadest chemical compatibility, lowest frictionCold creep, radiation damage
PTFE (Filled)Cryogenic to 550°FHigh-pressure service, better wear/extrusion resistanceSlightly less inert than virgin PTFE
PEEKCryogenic-poor to 600°FHigh temp/pressure, steam service, radiation resistanceBrittle when cold, attacked by sulfuric acid
PCTFEDown to -400°FCryogenic, low-outgassing (semiconductor)Niche/higher cost
TFMSame as PTFEPTFE chemistry with less cold flow/porosityPremium cost
Acetal (Delrin)ModerateHigh-pressure (5,000 psi), abrasion resistanceNarrower chemical range
UHMW-PEGeneral serviceAbrasive media, low-level radiationNot a broad chemical solution

Conclusion

Moving away from default polymer choices for ball valve seats and moving toward more optimized material choices can result in extended valve life and zero-leakage systems. Remember to specify the polymer compounds used in your design carefully; whether upgrading from virgin PTFE to TFM for better stress recovery, or specifying PCTFE to combat permeation, it can help ensure safety and longevity even in aggressive environments. And if you’d like to talk to one of our sealing specialist engineers, contact Advanced EMC today.