by Sara McCaslin Sara McCaslin No Comments

Solutions for Electrical Fluting from VFD-Driven Motors

You may have been in this situation: a bearing on a VFD-driven motor design has failed with no obvious overload, contamination, or lubrication issues. Upon teardown, fluting is evident. This article discusses what causes this problem, how to diagnose it correctly, and a basic solution hierarchy to mitigate the effects of fluting. 

Why VFDs Cause This Problem

VFDs (Variable Frequency Drives) use PWM switching (typically IGBTs) to synthesize the output waveform. The problem lies in fast-switching edges, not in the source voltage itself.

Where the Voltage Comes From

In short, fast switching (i.e., high dV/dt) combines with the motor’s parasitic capacitance to create a common-mode voltage. That voltage is referenced to the ground rather than between phases. Because the three-phase voltages do not sum to zero instantaneously on switching transitions, a residual common-mode component appears on the motor shaft. Note that this is inherent to the PWM TFD topology and is not a sign of a bad drive; it can occur even in systems that were correctly installed.

Construction of the Capacitor Network

The motor behaves as a set of parasitic capacitors: stator winding-to-frame, rotor-to-stator, and, most importantly, rotor-to-shaft-to-bearing. Electrically, the bearings sit between the shaft and the housing, separated by a thin film of lubricant. The lubricant, usually grease or oil, acts as a dielectric. As such, it makes the bearing itself act as a capacitor in the circuit.

Arcing Mechanism

The common-mode voltage charges the bearing’s lubricant film like a capacitor plate. As the voltage rises, it will eventually exceed the dielectric strength of the lubricant. The film begins to break down, and the charge stored in the dielectric film discharges as a spark across the rolling element/race contact. The effect is the same as a micro-EDM (electrical discharge machining) event (having far more impact than a simple case of resistive heating).

While each discharge event is tiny, on the order of microseconds with low energy, it is repetitive. It can happen thousands of times per second, depending on shaft rotation and switching frequency. 

There are three commonly accepted current paths involved in the arcing mechanism: (1) shaft voltage discharge/EDM currents, (2) high-frequency currents driven by flux asymmetry, and (3) rotor ground currents.

Visible Damage

Each of these thousands of discharge events removes a microscopic amount of material. Again, this is essentially the same physics as EDM machining, just unintentional and uncontrolled. Because the rolling elements pass over the same race positions repeatedly, damage will concentrate at those repeat contact points rather than being randomly distributed. Over time, which can range from weeks to months depending on severity, the repeated point damage accumulates into visible fluting. Fluting is a series of transverse grooves/ridges spaced at a pitch related to rolling element spacing.

Why It is Worse in the VFD Era

Older fixed-speed motors ran on sine-wave utility power with no PWM switching, and had no common-mode voltage source to speak of. However, modern IGBT-based drives switch much faster than earlier drive generations, which increases dV/dt and worsens the effect. In a parallel trend, EV traction 

motors push switching frequency even higher, which is part of why this issue is intensifying rather than fading as drives get more advanced

High Risk Applications

Certain applications are considered high risk for electrical fluting and EDM pitting. These include …

  • Larger motors / higher power ratings (more capacitive coupling)
  • Longer cable runs between drive and motor (affects reflected wave and common-mode behavior)
  • No shaft grounding provision
  • Standard (non-insulated) bearings on both drive-end and non-drive-end
  • Grease type/film thickness — thinner, more conductive films behave differently than thick, highly insulating ones, and neither is automatically safe

Diagnosis — Fluting vs. Other Failure Modes Under a Scope

Other failure modes that can be mistaken for fluting include true and false brinelling, as well as corrosion pitting.

The Appearance of Fluting

When observing fluting damage. there will be parallel, closely spaced transverse grooves or ridges running across the race width and perpendicular to the direction of rolling. This type of damage is often referred to as having a “washboard” or “corrugated” appearance. Also note that the spacing of the grooves often correlates with rolling-element spacing/pass frequency, which can serve as a diagnostic clue. As to the location, fluting can appear on both inner and outer races; the distribution and severity of the fluting between drive-end/non-drive-end can hint at the current path.

Under magnification, you will see individual craters or pits within the grooves, the actual EDM discharge sites, often described as looking like tiny volcanic craters when viewed at high magnification (SEM-level). In addition, it is common to see discoloration that may take the form of a gray, frosted, or matte-etched appearance rather than a bright/polished one. This is due to localized micro-melting and re-solidification from each discharge. Further, the edges of pits tend to be irregular and melted-looking.

Contrast: True Brinelling

True brinelling, often mistaken for fluting, is a distinctly different type of bearing damage that is caused by static overload or impact (heavy shock load while stationary). This is a mechanical failure, not an electrical one. True brinelling looks like discrete, smooth-walled indentations spaced at rolling element pitch, but each is a single clean dent — no fine internal texture, no discoloration/melting. This type of failure can be diagnosed by dents that match the static rolling-element spacing exactly and show no vibration/fretting content between them, because the bearing was not rotating when the damage occurred.

Contrast: False Brinelling

False brinelling, also known as fretting, is caused by micro-vibration without rotation and often happens during shipping/transport damage or standstill vibration near an operating machine. It exhibits shallow, polished or burnished wear marks often with reddish-brown fretting corrosion debris (iron oxide) at the contact points. It differs from fluting in that it has characteristic red/brown oxide debris and a polished surface texture with no crater pitting under magnification.

Contrast: Corrosion pitting

Corrosion pitting is caused by moisture ingress, chemical attack, or inadequate corrosion protection, but is not related to load pattern or electrical activity. It also has pitting, but it is 

randomly distributed rather than following rolling-element pitch or a directional groove pattern. The pit shapes tend to be irregular and do not align in the orderly rows fluting produces. Corrosion pitting can be differentiated from fluting because it is not correlated with rolling element spacing and is often accompanied by broader surface rust/staining beyond the raceway contact zone.

Diagnosing Fluting

Here is a simple diagnostic decision path for the diagnosis of fluting:

  • Is the damage pattern regularly spaced and directional (grooves) → suspect fluting or true brinelling
  • Under magnification, is there micro-pitting/crater texture and dark/etched discoloration → fluting; smooth without craters → true brinelling
  • If damage is polished with reddish oxide debris and no deep grooving → false brinelling
  • If damage is randomly distributed with no pitch correlation → corrosion pitting

Experts also recommend checking shaft voltage with a multimeter or oscilloscope as a confirming (not just visual) diagnostic when fluting is suspected. Its presence ties the root cause to the physical evidence rather than relying on appearance alone.

Tips for Diagnosing Fluting

In practice. basic magnification (10–30x loupe) is often enough to distinguish fluting from brinelling in the field. However, SEM imaging is the gold standard for confirming EDM-style micro-cratering when there is any ambiguity or when documenting a warranty/failure investigation. Finally, remember that a brush or contact probe riding on the shaft, feeding a high-voltage differential probe on an oscilloscope, remains the complementary electrical-side check that confirms the root cause rather than just the symptom.

Solution Hierarchy for Fluting

Why hierarchy? No one solution solves all the problems involved. In short, insulated bearings block the current path, grounding rings divert it, chokes reduce it, and each addresses a different one of the three current types (shaft-voltage discharge, high-frequency circulating current, rotor ground current). Choosing one option to protect a bearing location can simply push the current elsewhere.

Insulated Bearings

Insulated bearings are usually the first line of defense. A plasma-sprayed alumina coating on the inner or outer ring creates a dielectric barrier between shaft and housing. This approach typically delivers insulation resistance in the tens to hundreds of megohms with a dielectric withstand rating around 1500V DC. At roughly a 200–300% cost premium over a standard bearing, insulated bearings are a meaningful but manageable upgrade, most commonly specified at the non-drive end. In contrast, the drive end gets a grounding ring instead.

The catch is that insulating one location pushes current toward the uninsulated bearing, so this option is rarely used on its own. In addition, the coating can degrade from handling damage or moisture bridging the insulation layer. Periodic insulation-resistance checks belong in the reliability program, not just the commissioning checklist.

Hybrid Ceramic Bearings

Hybrid ceramic bearings take a more fundamental approach: steel races are paired with silicon nitride rolling elements that simply cannot conduct current across the rolling contact. This forms a broken circuit that is categorically more robust than a coating. Hybrid ceramic bearings are often priced at a 400–600% premium. It does, however, earn its cost on high-speed or high-consequence motors, or anywhere coating durability is a real concern. The same “current finds another path” caveat still applies, though: protecting the motor’s bearings and leaving a coupled gearbox or pump unprotected can still leave a coupled gearbox or pump unprotected, and that is often where the next fluting failure shows up. 

Shaft Grounding Rings

Instead of blocking current, shaft grounding rings provide an easier path than the bearing, typically through a conductive microfiber or a brush-contact ring at the shaft. This is the baseline protection recommended on nearly every VFD-driven motor, not an upgrade reserved for problem cases. Its limitation is scope: while it handles shaft-voltage discharge well, it does little on its own to address high-frequency circulating current in larger motors. This is why the standard pairing above roughly 100 HP is a grounding ring at the drive end + an insulated bearing at the non-drive end. Installation quality matters more than people expect here, as well. A ring that is not bonded to a clean shaft surface, or a frame that is not properly grounded, can be physically installed and still do almost nothing.

Common-Mode Chokes

Common-mode chokes at the VFD output take a source-side approach, reducing high-frequency common-mode current before it circulates through the system. Chokes suppress current, not the underlying common-mode voltage. They reduce circulating-current effects without eliminating shaft voltage buildup and discharge outright. Reported shaft-voltage reductions in the 50–70% range are real and worthwhile, but they’re a life-extension measure that complements bearing-side protection rather than replacing it.

Non-Conductive Plain Bearings

Non-conductive plain bearings round out the solution hierarchy as a different kind of fix entirely. Rather than insulating, diverting, or filtering current, they remove the point-contact rolling geometry that fluting depends on in the first place. Where they are mechanically viable, typically lower-load, lower-speed, or non-drive-end positions, they sidestep the problem instead of managing it, which makes them worth evaluating in the broader drivetrain even though they are not a substitute for the drive-end bearing on a high-speed motor

Conclusion

At Advanced EMC, our specialty lies in polymer solutions to bearings and seals. If you are investigating a bearing failure or trying to mitigate fluting issues using non-conductive plain bearings, then contact the bearing engineers at Advanced EMC.  

by Sara McCaslin Sara McCaslin No Comments

R-410A to R-454B: What Nobody Told You About Your Seals

The HVAC/refrigeration industry in the US is still in the midst of transitioning to A2L refrigerants (R-454B, R-32, etc.) that replace R-410A. These changes are required as part of the Environmental Protection Agency’s AIM Act and its mandate of a stepped phasedown reaching 40% below baseline by 2024 and 85% by 2036. This has forced HVAC manufacturers to shift away from R-410A to lower-GWP alternatives

And with that shift has come some surprising seal failures. A piece of HVAC equipment that has worked for 15 years starts experiencing seal leaks, hardening, or swelling for the first time. This is a serious compatibility issue between low-GWP refrigerants and traditional sealing solutions.

This article looks at the causes behind these failures, the failure modes involved, and seal materials to consider in solving these issues.

A Chemistry Lesson

The mechanisms behind the new seal failures occurring with low-GWP A2L refrigerants can be explained with some rather basic chemistry. 

Loss of the R-125 Buffer 

When swapping R-410A (a 50/50 blend of R-32 and R-125) for R-454B (68.9% R-32 / 31.1% R-1234yf) or pure R-32, the solvent properties of the working fluid change significantly. R-125 acted as a flammability suppressant and modified the polar solvency of the mixture. 

Next-generation A2L blends like R-454B remove R-125 entirely, and R-1234yf is itself a smaller, more polar molecule than R-125. The shift, then, is not just R-125’s absence, but also R-1234yf’s more aggressive solvency actively driving elastomer attack. The result of switching to A2Ls has been significantly higher fluid solvency against elastomers than R-410A produced. 

Enhanced Polymer Penetration

Higher concentrations of R-32 and fluorinated alkenes (HFOs) exhibit smaller molecular sizes and higher dipole interactions, increasing their diffusion rates into elastomeric matrices.

Polyolester (POE) & Polyvinyl Ether (PVE) Synergy

In addition, A2L refrigerants in US systems typically rely on Polyolester (POE) oils. The refrigerant lowers the viscosity of the oil and enhances its ability to penetrate elastomer matrix structures. As a result, the seal fails not from the gas alone, but from the combined refrigerant-oil working fluid. 

The Three Primary Failure Modes

There are three failure modes associated with the chemical reactions just discussed: gland overfill, post-maintenance leak, and RGD (Rapid Gas Decompression). 

Excessive Swell / Gland Fill-Ratio Exceedance

Overfilled seal glands, regardless of cause, lead to issues with extrusion into clearances, increased friction on dynamic shafts/spools, nibbling, and permanent mechanical tearing. This may initially appear as a lubrication issue, but it is not. The polymer matrix is absorbing the refrigerant/oil mixture, causing volume expansions exceeding 15–20%. Note that the seal was correctly sized and installed. The volume growth occuring afterward is from chemical absorption, not from an installation or specification error.

The “Post-Maintenance” Leak

As refrigerant permeates the seal, it leaches out the low-molecular-weight plasticizers, processing aids, and cross-linking agents from the elastomer. When this happens under system pressure, the seal appears tight because of swell. However, once the system is evacuated, vented, or cycled off, the absorbed refrigerant off-gasses from the seals. This off-gassing leaves behind an elastomer that has lost volume. The seal then shrinks below its original dimensions, losing compression set and causing sudden leaks.

Rapid Gas Decompression (RGD)

Next is RGD, which is a well-established failure mode in high-pressure gas sealing (e.g., API 6A, NORSOK M-710 test protocols) that A2L refrigerants newly expose HVAC seals to because of their smaller molecular size and higher solubility. In short, A2L molecules are able to permeate high-pressure elastomeric seals. During a rapid system pump-down or sudden pressure drop, the gas trapped inside the elastomer pores expands faster than it can diffuse out. The result of RGD is internal blistering, micro-fissures, and catastrophic seal rupture from the inside out.

Compatibility is at the Core

A2L systems commonly pair with different POE oil formulations than their A1 predecessors. It is, however, key to remember that the oil in A2L refrigerants is just as much a part of the compatibility question as the refrigerant itself. Testing a seal compound against R-454B alone while ignoring the oil is only testing half the problem. 

Seal Material Considerations

The information below summarizes the most commonly used materials for HVAC seals and their performance for both R140A and A2L refrigerants.

Sealing MaterialR-410A CompatibilityA2L (R-454B / R-32) RatingPrimary Risk & Failure MechanismsEngineering Recommendation
NBR (Nitrile)Acceptable Baseline (known long-term POE extraction risk)HIGH RISKHigh extraction of plasticizers; severe shrinkage post-evacuation. Swell varies unpredictably with ACN content.Not Recommended. Replace with peroxide-cured FKM or PTFE.
HNBR (Hydrogenated Nitrile)Good / ExcellentMODERATE TO HIGHHigh swell with low-ACN grades; low-temperature flexibility loss with high-ACN grades.Requires rigorous validation per compound formulation.
FKM (Standard Bisphenol-Cured)Standard ChoiceCONDITIONALVulnerable to chemical attack by basic additives/amines in PVE oils and polar A2L mixtures.Avoid standard grades. Use low-swell peroxide-cured FKMs.
FKM (High-Fluorine / Peroxide-Cured)ExcellentGOODSignificantly reduced swell and chemical resistance against POE/PVE mixtures.Recommended for static O-rings requiring elasticity.
EPDM*Specialty UseSEVERE FAILUREIncompatible with synthetic POE/PVE lubricants, causing immediate degradation and extreme swell.Prohibited in POE/PVE lubricated systems.
PTFE / Virgin & Filled PTFE**Premium / InertEXCELLENT (BEST PRACTICE)Zero chemical absorption, zero swell, zero plasticizer extraction, immune to RGD.Best Practice. Ideal for dynamic rotary shaft seals and control valves.
Fluorosint® 500 PTFE**Premium / InertEXCELLENT (BEST PRACTICE)Synthetic mica-filled PTFE; virtually immune to RGD, chemical swell, and leaching.Superior Choice. Offers lower thermal expansion and greater deformation resistance than standard PTFE under heavy load.
Fluorolon 1065**Premium / InertEXCELLENT (BEST PRACTICE)Modified PTFE compound with high chemical inertness and zero extraction risk.Cost-effective alternative to standard virgin/filled PTFE for aggressive A2L and lubricant environments.
Polyketone (PK)**GoodEXCELLENTRigid semi-crystalline thermoplastic; non-porous structure eliminates RGD and plasticizer leaching.Eco-friendly engineering option. High wear and impact strength; best suited for anti-extrusion back-up rings or structural seal components.
PVDF (Kynar®)**GoodEXCELLENTHigh mechanical strength and creep resistance; resistant to chemically aggressive refrigerants.Recyclable engineering polymer. Ideal for rigid back-up rings, valve seats, and high-pressure containment components.

*Note on EPDM: This incompatibility predates the A2L transition and applies to ester-based lubricants generally, not to the A2L refrigerant molecule itself. 

**Thermoplastic options (PTFE, Fluorosint, Fluorolon, Polyketone, PVDF) are not elastomers and are not drop-in replacements in standard elastomeric O-ring grooves. They typically require redesign (e.g., spring-energized lip seals) or are used as backup/anti-extrusion rings.

Conclusion

As legacy systems are retrofitted for use with A2L refrigerants, it is important to consider the compatibility of both the refrigerant and its oils with the seal materials. If you are looking for an effective seal design that is resistant to the harmful effects of A2L refrigerants, talk to the seal experts at Advanced EMC. Our team is familiar with HVAC / Refrigeration seal needs and is ready to work with you from design to installation and beyond.