by Sara McCaslin, PhD Sara McCaslin, PhD No Comments

Spring Energized Seals vs. O-Rings

As long as your application involves static pressures, no extremes in either temperature or pressure, and no corrosive chemicals, an elastomeric o-ring will probably suffice. But things become more challenging outside of those conditions and you will need a better sealing solution: a spring energized seal.

O-Ring Seals

O-rings are a common type of seal that’s used in a wide variety of applications. Elastomeric o-rings are made from materials such as silicone, Neoprene, Nitrile, Buna N, and EPDM Rubber and consist of a toroid with a circular cross-section. In fact, the official definition of an elastomer component is that it does not break when stretched 100% (i.e., stretches to twice its original length). 

O-rings can effectively provide a barrier to prevent fluids from leaking and work well for static applications and some dynamic applications as long as there are no extremes in pressure or temperature. However, there are times when a spring-energized seal provides a better sealing solution than an o-ring. 

O-rings often fail due to issues with clearance as high pressures, large temperature changes, or cyclical changes in either pressure or temperature, all of which can cause dimensional changes that force the o-ring into the seal extrusion gap and cause excessive wear that leads to premature failure. In addition, environmental conditions and temperature changes can lead to the elastomeric material becoming brittle, thus losing its ability to stretch and compromising its ability to provide an effective seal.

Spring-Energized Seals

The spring energizer seal is the engineer’s choice when O-Rings cannot provide adequate seal performance.The energized seal applies a consistent force that enables the lip to adapt to the contact surface as it rotates. Because of this, spring-energized seals are often used to effectively maintain a seal even when there are challenges such as vacuum pressures, eccentric contact surfaces, runout, and hardware gaps. In short, where other static and dynamic sealing options fail, spring-energized seals rise to the task.

Operating Conditions Where Spring-Energized Seals Excel

Despite the additional cost, spring-energized seals are preferred over elastomeric o-rings when there are …

  • Extreme pressures (including vacuum pressures)
  • Extreme temperatures (including cryogenic environments)
  • Dynamic (as opposed to static) pressures
  • Corrosive media (when materials such as PEEK and PTFE are used)
  • Cyclic pressures or temperatures

In such conditions, even the best elastomeric O-rings will start losing their ability to seal. They can become brittle in extreme temperatures, and exposure to corrosive media will accelerate their natural wear. Using O-rings in such operating environments can seriously compromise the reliability of equipment and the safety of personnel, not to mention potential environmental impacts.

Additional Benefits

Also keep in mind that spring-energized seals are available with FDA approved jacket materials such as PTFE and PEEK that make them safe for use in applications such as food processing, pharmaceutical, biochemical, and medical. Their extreme durability makes them ideal for harsh environment industries such as petrochemical, oil and gas, and aerospace. 

Conclusion

When all other sealing solutions fail, a spring-energized seal is likely the answer. They consistently provide reliable sealing in operating environments that destroy o-rings, and in turn enhance the dependability, safety, and performance of the equipment that depends on them for proper operation. 

Want to learn more? Contact us today!

by Sara McCaslin, PhD Sara McCaslin, PhD No Comments

Injection Molding of Fluoropolymers: What You Need to Know

Injection Molded Parts

Fluoropolymers are used in multiple industries, including aerospace, transportation, chemical and petrochemical processing, pharmaceutical, medical, telecommunications, and electronics where they are used for seals, gaskets, bushings, bearings, hoses, tubing, wiring, and even fiber optic cladding. There are multiple ways to manufacture parts and components made from fluoropolymers, and injection molding is one of them.

What Are Fluoropolymers?

Fluoropolymers, as the name no doubt implies, are polymers that are based on bonding between fluorine and carbon. The first fluoropolymer was PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene), which is perhaps better known by its trade name Teflon. Other common fluoropolymers include ETFE (ethylene tetrafluoroethylene), PFA (perfluoroalkoxy alkane), PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride), PVF (perfluoralkoxy), FEP (fluorinated ethylene propylene), and ECTFE (ethylene chlorotrifluoroethylene).

They are popular materials because of their properties that include resistance to high temperatures, chemical attacks, and electrical current. They are also low friction, non-toxic, exhibit minimal aging and leaching of chemicals, and non-stick. In addition, many fluoropolymers are biocompatible, making them ideal for medical applications.

Injection Molding Process

Injection molding is a manufacturing method for thermoplastic materials where the plastics are heated almost to their melting point and then fed into aluminum or steel molds at extremely high pressures using a powerful screw mechanism. There are several benefits to injection molding:

  • Can handle high-volume production
  • Labor costs are relatively low
  • Products highly accurate parts that can meet tight tolerances
  • Consistent results
  • Supports fairly complex designs with fine details
  • Produces an excellent surface finish
  • In many instances, the scrap can be recycled

The major cost involved in injection molding is the tooling: to achieve good results, the molds must be high-quality and well designed. However, molds can be configured to make multiple parts at one time with minimal post-processing.

Note that injection molding can be used to manufacture otherwise challenging components, including thin-walled parts. The feasible envelope for parts can typically range from 0.01 in³ to 80 ft³ (depending on the fabricators’ capabilities) and can achieve tight tolerances and smooth surfaces.

Injection Molding Fluoropolymers

While fluoropolymers can be challenging to injection mold, the process is not impossible for most materials. Some of the best fluoropolymers for injection molding include PFA and FEP, which are both melt-processable. Additional consideration may have to be given to the tooling for molding fluoropolymers, including a hot runner system to keep the polymer flowing easily as it moves through the mold. 

PTFE, however, is challenging to injection mold because even when heated above its melting point because it simply will not flow like other thermoplastic polymers. It does soften, but not enough to make injection molding possible. Fortunately, there are several other options when it comes to manufacturing with PTFE, including machining, compression molding, cold extrusion, and isostatic pressing.   

Conclusion

Fluoropolymers are widely used in many different industries and applications. If you are looking for an effective way to reliably manufacture components using a fluoropolymer, injection molding may be an excellent option.

Want to learn more? Contact us today!