PTFE Rotary Shaft Seals
by Sara McCaslin, PhD Sara McCaslin, PhD No Comments

Pressure Cycling and Pulsation Issues in Polymer Seals

Pressure cycling and pulsation can lead to seal issues like extrusion, blow-by, and fatigue damage. There are, however, some design principles that can address these issues and mitigate their effects. This article takes a look at the issues related to cycling and pulsation and addresses six key design considerations related to them.

Pressure Cycling and Pulsation

Pressure cycling refers to repeated transitions between low and high pressure, including dwell time at each level. Pulsation, on the other hand, is associated with high-frequency pressure oscillations superimposed on the mean system pressure (often pump- or compressor-driven). Pressure spikes are short-duration transients that exceed nominal operating pressure.

Designing polymer seals for cyclic pressure and pulsation is actually a system-level problem. Consideration must go into the material, energization method, gland geometry, hardware stiffness, surface finish, and validation testing.

Seal Issues Related to Pressure Cycling and Pulsation

When polymer seals are subject to pressure cycling and pulsation, the primary design objective becomes the ability to maintain adequate contact stress and sealing integrity throughout the entire pressure waveform while avoiding extrusion, blow-by, and fatigue damage.

Extrusion occurs when the seal is forced into a clearance gap by pressure, like a soft solid getting pushed into a narrow crack. Blow-by takes place when a pressurized fluid or gas leaks past the seal because there is not enough contact stress. Fatigue damage is the progressive cracking or material breakdown that is caused by repeated loading cycles. Note that each individual cycle can be below the material’s one-time strength limit and still result in fatigue damage.

Signs of Pressure Cycling and Pulsation Issues

There are several signs that pressure cycling and pulsation are causing problems. One of the first is early leakage after a very short run-in period. The seal might also experience intermittent leakage that is related to the duty cycle or pump frequency. Another sign of seal problems is the extrusion of the gear lip, torn edges, or nibbling. Finally, backup ring displacement or seal rotation can also be a signal of issues. 

These problems usually show up in hydraulic actuators, pumps, and manifolds, gas compression stage and valve plates, chemical processing skids with pulsation dampeners, and high-cycle test equipment and aerospace pneumatic systems.

Design Tips for Addressing Pressure Issues

Here are some design tips for working with seals undergoing pressure cycling.

Pressure Waveform

In order to mitigate issues with pressure cycling and pulsation, it is important to look at the pressure waveform and not just the peak pressure. For example, document mean pressure, peak pressure, minimum pressure, ramp rate, frequency, and dwell times. Then identify the transient spikes separately from the steady cycles. Once this information has been gathered, map the waveform to the duty cycle and the total number of cycles.

Polymer

Remember to select the polymer family for the seal based on cyclic strength and creep resistance. Filled PTFE offers good creep resistance and extrusion margin. PEEK and PPS options can lead to a higher modulus, better load retention, and improved wear. UHMW-PE offers low friction but lower stiffness. However, keep in mind that the material choice should also be considered with regard to the temperature, media, PV, and allowable deformation.

Spring-Energized Seals

Another excellent option is to utilize spring-energized seals to maintain contact stress when system pressure drops. These seals have pressure-energized lips designed to avoid issues during pressure reversals. In addition, consider the use of dual-acting geometries for bidirectional pressure. And avoid relying solely on squeeze for long-life high-cycle conditions when relaxation is expected.

Seal Gland

When designing the gland, it is important to ensure that the seal is both well-supported and deforms in a controlled manner when subjected to pressure cycling. The compressive fa orce should provide reliable initial sealing force without being so high that excessive creep results over time. Utilize radii and lead-in chamfers to eliminate sharp edges that can result in problematic notches or tears. And when clearances cannot be held tightly, use anti-extrusion features to ensure the pressure cannot force the polymer into a gap.

Backup Ring

Another potential aspect of the design is the use of a backup ring. Its material should be fully compatible with the primary seal and can maintain strength and dimensional stability across the operating temperature range. When deciding between split or solid design backup rings, keep in mind potential issues with rotation and migration during pressure pulsation. 

Surface Finish

Under pressure cycling, the surface and interface details matter significantly. Small leak paths are the potential problems here, and can be addressed. First, the counterface roughness should result in a surface that supports film formation but does not lead to bypass channels or issues with abrasive wear. The lay direction should prevent machining grooves from behaving as micropumps during pressure fluctuations. In addition, if there is a possibility that erosion, wear, or corrosion could affect the roughness over time, use coatings or surface treatment that will stabilize the counterface.

Conclusion

Pressure cycling and pulsation can cause extrusion, blow-by, and fatigue damage. Careful design, however, can mitigate these issues.

If you are working on a seal design that must provide reliable performance when subject to pressure cycling and pulsation, let the polymer seal experts at Advanced EMC help. Contact us today.

by Sara McCaslin, PhD Sara McCaslin, PhD No Comments

Harsh Chemical Environments: Why Polymer Seals Outperform Metal

In industries where equipment is constantly exposed to harsh chemical environments, corrosion is a leading cause of premature seal failure, unplanned downtime, and costly maintenance. Even with protective coatings and careful material selection, metal is still vulnerable to pitting, stress corrosion cracking, and galvanic attack.

Certain engineering polymers are inherently resistant to the many forms that chemical degradation can take. They provide a proven and reliable solution to sealing even in some of the most corrosive environments. 

This article reviews the basics of corrosion, explains why corrosion is not a problem for polymers, and discusses the most common engineering polymers used in sealing solutions.

Metals Sealing Solutions and Corrosion

Metal seals used to be chosen for their strength and rigidity, but their metallic composition makes them susceptible to various forms of corrosion. For example, uniform corrosion can occur when the entire surface is exposed to a reactive chemical, causing the material to gradually thin. Another example is pitting corrosion, which is very common in chloride-rich or acidic environments. This type of corrosion generates localized damage that can quickly compromise sealing integrity.

Galvanic corrosion is another issue, especially when dissimilar metals come into contact in the presence of an electrolyte. In addition, stress corrosion cracking can occur when tensile stress and a corrosive atmosphere act together, leading to sudden and unexpected failure. Once corrosion begins, sealing forces diminish, leakage risk increases, and imminent failure awaits if the seal is not replaced proactively.

Why Polymers Excel in Harsh Chemical Environments

Polymers do not experience galvanic corrosion because they are non-conductive. In addition, some high-performance polymers (e.g., PTFE) are chemically inert, meaning they will not react with acids, bases, or solvents. This level of chemical stability allows them to maintain their dimensions and mechanical properties even after years of exposure to aggressive media. When used with compatible chemicals, several engineering polymers do not experience pitting or stress corrosion cracking. 

In addition to corrosion resistance, polymers offer low friction and reduced wear rates, which can extend the service life of both the seal and the mating surface. Some, like PTFE and UHMW-PE, provide self-lubricating properties that enable dry running. Their lighter weight can also benefit marine and transportation applications where every pound matters.

Polymer Beads

Commonly Used Materials for Seals in Harsh Chemical Environments

PTFE (Polytetrafluoroethylene)

PTFE (commonly known as Teflon) is one of the most widely used polymers for seals due to its exceptional chemical resistance, extremely low friction, and broad operating temperature range from -200°C to +260°C. It remains stable in the presence of almost all industrial chemicals, making it ideal for O-rings, gaskets, and dynamic seals used in even the most aggressive environments.

PEEK (Polyetheretherketone)

PEEK is a go-to choice for sealing applications that demand both chemical resistance and mechanical strength under high temperature and pressure. It maintains integrity in aerospace, oil and gas, and chemical processing environments where seals are subjected to extreme loads and aggressive media.

Hytrel (Thermoplastic Polyester Elastomer)

Hytrel has an unusual combination of flexibility with chemical resistance, making Hytrel sealing solutions exhibit reliable performance across a wide temperature range. It is commonly used in automotive, hydraulic, and pneumatic seals where both elasticity and resistance to fuels, oils, and industrial fluids are critical.

Kynar (Polyvinylidene Fluoride, PVDF)

Kynar, sometimes referred to as PVDF, provides excellent resistance to acids, bases, and organic solvents. Its stability under long-term chemical exposure makes it a reliable material for seals and gaskets in chemical processing equipment, including pumps, valves, and pipelines.

PPS (Polyphenylene Sulfide)

PPS offers high-temperature capability and chemical resistance, making it a strong candidate for sealing in automotive and industrial applications where both thermal cycling and aggressive fluids are present. It retains dimensional stability and mechanical performance under prolonged exposure to harsh conditions.

Performance Benefits in Harsh Chemical Environments

Polymer sealing solutions can avoid the problematic degradation mechanisms plaguing traditional metal seals. Corrosion immunity combined with other key seal properties allows them to maintain sealing pressure and integrity over more extended periods, reducing the frequency of replacements. Also, lower maintenance requirements translate into both cost savings and less downtime.

Materials with dry-running capability, such as PTFE or filled PEEK, allow operation without lubrication. This can be critical in environments where lubricants could be washed away or contaminated. In aerospace systems, the weight savings from polymer components alone can improve energy efficiency and handling.

Conclusion

When corrosion is a constant threat, polymer seals offer a long-lasting, low-maintenance alternative to traditional metal designs. The chemical resistance, dimensional stability, and low-friction properties of engineering polymers make them ideal as sealing solutions for harsh chemical environments. By specifying polymer seals early in the design phase, engineers can improve system reliability, reduce downtime, and lower lifetime costs.

Contact Advanced EMC or request a quote to discuss polymer sealing solutions engineered for your specific operating conditions and chemical challenges.