by Daniel Mays Daniel Mays No Comments

Encapsulated O-Rings: Reliable Sealing for Aggressive Chemicals and Extreme Conditions

Encapsulated O-rings bridge the gap between chemical resistance and elastic sealing force. In this blog post, we discuss what an encapsulated O-ring is, why it is used, its design, and where it is used.

What are Encapsulated O-Rings?

Encapsulated O-rings have a fluoropolymer jacket that protects an internal energizing element (usually an elastomer or a spring energizer). They successfully combine the chemical resistance and thermal performance of engineering fluoropolymers with the elastic recovery of an inner core, allowing them to serve as a successful sealing solution in operating environments that are too harsh for traditional elastomeric O-rings.

Why Use Encapsulated O-Rings

Encapsulated O-rings offer several key features, beginning with their excellent chemical compatibility with a very wide range of aggressive fluids and gases. They also provide excellent temperature capabilities that are well beyond those of conventional elastomers. The use of a fluoropolymer jacket also means that there will be less permeation, swelling, and degradation. Finally, encapsulated O-rings offer long-term sealing reliability in both static and low-speed dynamic applications. 

Encapsulation Approach

Encapsulating Material

The most common jacket materials used for encapsulation are FEP or PFA .

PropertyFEP (Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene)PFA (Perfluoroalkoxy)
Chemical ResistanceExcellent chemical resistance; suitable for most aggressive acids, bases, and solventsNear-universal chemical resistance, comparable to PTFE, including highly aggressive media
Temperature RangeTypically −200 °C to +205 °C (−328 °F to +400 °F)Typically −200 °C to +260 °C (−328 °F to +500 °F)
Elasticity / FlexibilityMore flexible than PTFE; performs well in thin-wall encapsulationsSlightly stiffer than FEP but more flexible than PTFE
Melt ProcessabilityFully melt-processable; easily extruded and encapsulatedFully melt-processable; allows precise, uniform encapsulation
Jacket ManufacturingWell suited for seamless encapsulation around elastomer or spring coresSuitable for seamless encapsulation, though processing is more demanding
Permeation ResistanceVery low permeabilityExtremely low permeability, lower than FEP
Surface FinishVery low coefficient of friction; smooth and consistentVery low coefficient of friction; excellent surface finish
Seal ConformabilityGood conformability due to jacket flexibilityModerate conformability; relies more on core energization than FEP
Typical Use in Encapsulated O-RingsMost common jacket material due to flexibility and ease of processingUsed for higher-temperature or more chemically aggressive applications
Cost ConsiderationsGenerally more cost-effectiveHigher material and processing costs than FEP

Encapsulation Thickness

The thickness of the jacket has a significant impact on the performance of the encapsulated O-ring. A thinner jacket means increased flexibility and conformability, as well as better sealing at low compression loads. A thicker jacket provides better chemical protection and resistance to permeation, but also means reduced flexibility and the need for a higher sealing force. 

It is important to balance the thickness with application requirements, including pressure, temperature, media aggressiveness, and gland design.

The jacket needs to be sufficiently thick to resist creep, deformation, and intrusion, as well as permeation and chemical resistance. In addition, the thickness must align with the tolerances, gland dimensions, and required compression. The jacket thickness must also account for thermal expansion over the operating temperature range. 

Seamless or Split Encapsulated O-rings

Another factor in the design of encapsulated O-rings is the manufacturing method used, either seamless or split encapsulation. The difference between the two directly affects sealing reliability. Seamless encapsulation forms a continuous jacket around the internal energizing core. This eliminates joints or weld lines that could become leak paths or chemical ingress points. 

Split encapsulation, on the other hand, uses a longitudinal seam that is closed after assembly. This makes installation easier but can introduce a potential weak spot under pressure, vacuum, or thermal cycling. For more demanding applications involving aggressive chemicals, vacuum service, or pressure fluctuations, the seamless encapsulation method is generally preferred because it provides more uniform sealing performance and improved long-term durability.

Internal Core

Elastomer cores are commonly used in encapsulated O-rings for applications operating within moderate temperature and pressure ranges. Silicone or fluorocarbon elastomers have excellent elasticity and good initial compression recovery. This allows the seal to conform to minor surface imperfections. While cost-effective and suitable for many static sealing applications, elastomer cores are more susceptible to compression set and loss of resilience at temperature extremes.

Materials such as 302 stainless steel, FKM, or EPDM spring-energized cores are used when elastomers cannot reliably perform. This usually occurs in operating conditions that include extreme temperatures, vacuum conditions, or long service life requirements. By replacing elastomers with metal springs, these designs deliver consistent sealing force across a wide temperature range and maintain contact pressure even in vacuum or low-pressure environments. This makes spring-energized encapsulated O-rings well suited for critical static sealing applications where long-term reliability is essential.

Where Encapsulated O-Rings are Used

Encapsulated O-rings are often used in chemical processing systems where aggressive acids, solvents, and corrosive fluids are present. The fluoropolymer jackets provide excellent chemical resistance, which makes them a reliable choice for harsh media handling and long service intervals. In pharmaceutical and sanitary systems, encapsulated designs are desirable when cleanability, low contamination risk, and consistent sealing performance are necessary.

In aerospace and vacuum applications, encapsulated O-rings are able to maintain sealing integrity across extreme temperatures and low-pressure conditions . In addition, they are  a critical sealing solution in semiconductor manufacturing and other high-purity processes, that require excellent performance with regard to  outgassing, extractables, and chemical compatibility.

These O-rings are used with valve stems, flanges, joints, swivels, pumps, turbo expanders, and waterless fracking.

Conclusion

Encapsulated O-rings are an excellent option for applications that involve aggressive chemicals, wide temperature ranges, or high-purity environments that cause conventional elastomers to swell, degrade, or contaminate the system. If you are in the market for encapsulated O-rings, contact Advanced EMC today. Our team of sealing specialists are happy to work with you in finding the right solutions for your design needs.

by Daniel Mays Daniel Mays No Comments

High-Performance Polymer Bearings: Materials, Advantages, and Use Cases

High-performance polymer bearings are replacing metal in increasingly demanding applications. The low-friction, dry-running capabilities, chemical resistance, and weight savings are just a few of the reasons why polymer bearings are gaining favor among engineers. This blog post focuses on three materials — PEEK, PPS, PAI, and PTFE — and their applicability to plane bearing applications.

Advantages of High-Performance Polymer Bearings

Bearing-grade engineering polymers such as PEEK, PPS, PAI, and PTFE are excellent options for bearing design. Compared to traditional metal bearings, these can run dry with minimal lubrication, generate less frictional heat, and experience less wear. They also offer corrosion resistance and are resistant to many problematic chemicals, along with significant weight savings. They also serve as natural electrical insulators and offer good vibration damping. High-performance polymer bearings are also compatible with clean environments (e.g., medical and semiconductor).

Understanding High-Performance Polymer Bearings

What makes a bearing material high-performance? First is low friction and natural lubricity, which reduces friction and the amount of heat generated by friction. Next is resistance: resistance to wear, resistance to chemicals, and resistance to absorbing moisture. Dimensional stability is also key, as well as the ability to maintain their load capacity under heat. Finally, PV limits serve as a benchmark for how suitable a high-performance polymer is for a particular application.

Material Profiles for High-Performance Polymer Bearings

1. PEEK (Polyetheretherketone)

PEEK is a semicrystalline, high-performance thermoplastic that is best known to engineers for its balance of strength, temperature resistance, and dimensional stability. It has excellent mechanical strength, with bearing grades able to withstand up to 6,00 psi. It also possesses excellent high-temperature performance up to 480°F continuous. In addition, PEEK has excellent chemical resistance that includes fuels, oils, solvents, and corrosive media. It also provides good creep resistance and dimensional stability even under thermal cycling.

Depending on the grade chosen, PEEK’s PV rating is 100,000 PV (Fluorolon 3015, PEEK BG) or 50,000 PV (Fluorolon 3010), with velocities up to 600 SFM and low friction (especially when graphite is used as a filler).

PEEK is often used with high-speed actuators, pumps, compressors, downhole and energy-sector applications, and aerospace mechanical linkages.

2. PPS (Polyphenylene Sulfide)

PPS is a rigid, aromatic polymer known for excellent chemical inertness and good dimensional stability, especially in corrosive environments. PPS is resistant to nearly all solvents, acids, bases, fuels, and process chemicals and has a continuous-use temperature of up to 400°F. It has naturally low friction and low moisture absorption, but is more brittle and less impact resistant than PEEK or PAI. 

PPS good PV ratings, depending on the grade used (i.e, 25,000 PV for Fluorolon 5065 and 11,000–12,000 PV  for Fluorolon 5025, 5010). It also possesses a load capacity of up to 2,000 psi, dependent on the grade chosen. 

PPS works very well in chemical processing equipment, automotive components exposed to aggressive chemicals, pumps and valves with moderate loads, and applications where chemical performance and corrosion resistance outweigh mechanical requirements.

3. PAI (Polyamide-Imide)

Torlon, or PAI, is the highest-strength thermoplastic available for bearing applications. Its imide backbone provides exceptional thermal, mechanical, and creep resistance. It has excellent compressive strength and fatigue resistance, with a continuous use temperature up to 500°F. It also has low friction in its graphite-filled grades, like Torlon 4301. 

PAI has good PV ratings, with 100,000 PV  for Torlon 4435 and  50,000 PV for Torlon 4301. Its velocity limit is 850–900 SFM, one of the highest speeds for non-metal bearings. And its load capacity is up to 1,000 psi. 

PAI bearings are commonly used for aerospace linkages and flap actuators, industrial machinery with extreme loads, robotic joints and linear motion systems, and high-temperature turbine or compressor environments. 

4. PTFE (Polytetrafluoroethylene, Filled and Unfilled)

PTFE is the lowest-friction engineering material available. It offers near-universal chemical resistance, but has lower strength and PV capability than PEEK or PAI. In fact, its ultra-low coefficient of friction makes it often used in dry-running or low-lubrication conditions. PTFE also has exceptional chemical resistance as it is inert to nearly all chemicals. High thermal resistance is another key property of PTFE: depending on the grade, it can be between
500°F–550°F depending on grade. However, it exhibits poor mechanical strength and creep resistance unless fillers are used.

Its PV rating depends heavily on fillers: 10,000 PV for filled PTFE grades like Rulon LR, J, W2, and only 1,000 PV  for unfilled PTFE: Fluorolon 1000. PTFE’s velocity limits are up to 400 SFM. For filled PTFE grades, the load capacity ranges from 750 to 1,000 psi.

PTFE bearings work best as low-load, low-to-moderate speed bearings. Common areas of application include chemical processing, where exposure to highly corrosive chemicals is expected, and semiconductor and cleanroom applications, where contamination is not acceptable.

Conclusion

High-performance polymer bearings made from PEEK, PPS, PAI, and PTFE offer significant advantages over traditional metal counterparts, including low friction, chemical resistance, and weight savings. And polymer bearings extend equipment life, improve reliability, and increase efficiency. 

If you’re evaluating materials for demanding bearing applications, our engineers can help you identify the best polymer solution for your requirements. Contact Advanced EMC today to discuss your design challenges and request a consultation.