by Sara McCaslin, PhD Sara McCaslin, PhD No Comments

Choosing the Right Polymer Backup Ring

Choosing the right polymer backup ring can be challenging, but having a basic understanding of how they work, combined with some guidelines, can make the design decisions much easier. This blog post provides a brief overview of what backup rings are, what distinguishes polymer backup rings, and how to choose the right one for a specific application.

Backup Rings

Backup rings are supportive elements typically used with O-rings in sealing systems to help prevent extrusion in the clearance gap of a seal. Often used in high-temperature or high-pressure applications, these rings have lower coefficients of expansion and are engineered to be very rigid and tough. Backup rings can also help to evenly distribute pressure in applications involving varying clearance gaps or pressure fluctuations. Additionally, backup rings help to reduce the effects of wear and friction on O-rings and serve as a thermal barrier to protect them from excessive heat. 

Why Polymer Backup Rings?

Polymer backup rings are often used in place of elastomeric versions because they offer significantly better resistance to extrusion, deformation, chemical resistance, and long-term creep under high pressure. Materials like PTFE, PEEK, or Nylon tolerate wider temperature swings, aggressive fluids, and high-cycle dynamic motion without breaking down. The result is a more stable sealing system with significantly reduced risk of issues such as blowouts, spiral failure, or premature wear. 

Choosing the Right Polymer Backup Ring

There are several different factors that go into selecting the right polymer backup ring. 

Clearance Gap

The clearance gap is one of the most important factors when specifying a polymer backup ring. It directly determines how much support the O-ring needs to prevent extrusion. As the gap increases, the load on the elastomer rises, and the likelihood of extrusion rises sharply. This is especially true at higher pressures or temperatures.

Keep in mind that larger gaps typically require a stiffer polymer (such as PEEK instead of PTFE), a thicker or contoured backup ring profile, or even double backup rings for bidirectional pressure. Small, well-controlled gaps, however, may allow the use of thinner PTFE rings. In short, the wider the clearance gap, the stronger and more dimensionally stable the backup material must be..

Pressure and Temperature

Environmental factors that influence the selection of the right backup ring include system pressure, as higher pressures require harder, more extrusion-resistant materials. System temperatures, which impact dimensional stability, can limit the choice of materials based on their operating temperature limits. High temperatures can make materials more pliable, while low temperatures can lead to brittle behavior. Temperature also affects dimensional stability, as thermal expansion can increase the clearance gap and increase the likelihood of extrusion. 

Static or Dynamic

Another key factor in selecting a backup ring is whether the sealing system will operate in a dynamic or static environment. Static systems will involve less mechanical stress on the backup ring, allowing a wider range of polymer materials to be suitable. In contrast, dynamic applications that introduce continuous motion, friction, and side loading require tougher, more wear-resistant polymers with excellent dimensional stability, such as PEEK or certain PTFE blends. 

Backup Ring Shape

The two most commonly used backup ring shapes are the scarf-cut and solid types. Scarf-cut backup rings feature a single angled split that allows them to flex during installation. They can also conform more easily to the groove and reduce the risk of damage during assembly, since the ring can be expanded or compressed without overstressing the material. Because they can open slightly, scarf-cut rings are often chosen when hardware tolerances are tight or when installation must be done without special tools. 

Solid backup rings do not have a split and must be made from a more flexible polymer that allows them to be stretched or compressed into place without cracking. While they do not offer the same level of extrusion resistance as scarf-cut designs in extreme conditions, their continuous, unbroken profile provides uniform support and is useful in moderate-pressure systems where ease of installation and stable sealing performance are priorities.

Back-Up Ring Material

PTFE is an excellent option for backup rings due to its extremely low coefficient of friction and extensive chemical compatibility. Applications requiring dynamic sealing or very low temperatures are excellent opportunities to use PTFE. PTFE does have its limitations, however. There is the possibility of cold flow under sustained loads, which can make it unsuitable for extreme pressure conditions. Virgin PTFE is limited to about 3,600 psi. Filled PTFE (e.g., glass-filled, carbon-filled, graphite-filled, bronze-filled) is effective for pressures up to 5,800 psi.

PEEK possesses high mechanical strength and excellent resistance to extrusion, with thermal stability up to 480°F and exceptional resistance to extrusion. PEEK can be used at pressures up to 20,000 psi and a maximum temperature of 500°F. These properties make PEEK an excellent option for both high-pressure and high-temperature applications. Additional strength and hardness can be achieved by using various fillers. Finally, PEEK is compatible with a wide range of chemicals and exhibits very low friction. 

Nylon works very well in moderate conditions and is more economical compared to PEEK and PTFE. However, it does have some critical limitations that include swelling and water absorption, both of which can heavily impact tolerances. Nylon 6,6 works well at pressures below 10,000 psi and a maximum temperature of 186°F. Nylon 6,6 filled with Molybdenum Disulfide (MoS2) to reduce friction is commonly used for backup rings. However, one of the drawbacks of Nylon 6,6 is its water absorption, which can range from 0.5% to 1.4% per 24 hours.

Conclusion

Choosing the right polymer backup ring is ultimately about understanding the pressures, temperatures, clearances, and motion your system must withstand. When those variables are matched with the correct geometry and material, you will have a more reliable sealing system with fewer failures and a longer service life. If you need help evaluating your application or choosing the optimal backup ring design, Advanced EMC’s engineering team is ready to assist. Contact us today to discuss your requirements and get expert guidance on the best polymer sealing solution for your equipment.

by Sara McCaslin, PhD Sara McCaslin, PhD No Comments

Polymer Seals in Food and Dairy Applications: Challenges for Engineers

There are numerous challenges associated with polymer seals for the food and dairy industries, and the complications are numerous. From hygiene by design and zero tolerance for contamination to the unbelievably high cost of recalls, to temperature swings and moisture issues, engineers put in a significant amount of work to ensure that polymer seals are designed and specified correctly. 

This blog post will explore the challenges and discuss solutions to each one.

Challenge 1: Surviving sanitation cycles (CIP/SIP)

CIP (Clean In Place) and SIP (Sanitize In Place) are harsh on seals and can involve repeated exposure to hot caustics, oxidizers, steam, and sometimes UV radiation. Additionally, the thermal spikes that often accompany CIP/SIP can lead to dimensional issues due to expansion and contraction. Issues with moisture absorption during the sanitation cycles are also a major problem.

Engineers need to consider the chemical intertness of the polymer chosen, as well as dimensional stability through temperature changes and low moisture absorption. Materials such as PTFE and UHMW-PE are an ideal choice for addressing these issues. They can retain key properties across cryogenic to steam conditions and withstand the most common CIP/SIP chemicals. Finally, PTFE is stable under exposure to UV used for sanitation.

Challenge 2: Chemical compatibility with cleaners and barrier fluid

Some of the common chemicals that are used to clean food and dairy equipment include . . .

  • Alkaline cleaners (such as sodium hydroxide-based)
  • Acidic cleaners (such as phosphoric or nitric acid) 
  • Oxidizing agents like sodium hypochlorite (bleach) or peracetic acid 
  • Quaternary ammonium compounds (quats)

These chemicals can lead to various issues, depending on the material used for the seal, including softening, hardening, and cracking. However, PTFE and UHMW-PE are minimally reactive to such chemicals.

Challenge 3: Contamination control and lubricant management

In the food and dairy industry, any external lubricant can become a contaminant; even “food-grade” oils complicate HACCP plans. This severely limits the type of polymers that can be used for seals; however, PTFE and UHMW-PE are both self-lubricating and can handle dry running.

Challenge 4: Moisture, swelling, and dimensional drift

Hot washdowns and steam can drive steam into hygroscopic materials, which leads to swelling and dimensional drift that can, in turn, cause compression and changes in clearances. PTFE and UHMW-PE exhibit negligible moisture absorption, which enhances fit and facilitates improved leak control after washdown. 

Challenge 5: Abrasion and scratch avoidance on product-contact surfaces

Product-contact surfaces must stay as free as possible of abrasions and scratches because such surface imperfections can trap microbes and residues. For this reason, surfaces must be durable, smooth, and easy to clean. UHMW-PE offers exceptional abrasion resistance while remaining gentle to mating surfaces, and PTFE has a very low surface energy that effectively sheds debris.

Challenge 6: Wear life and unplanned downtime

When seals fail, there is a much higher risk of contamination and increased downtime. Both are expensive to deal with. PTFE and UHMW-PE both exhibit excellent wear resistance, which can extend service life and reduce the frequency of unplanned downtime. 

Challenge 7: Taste, odor, and extractables

Some polymers leach flavors or odors into sensitive products, which is unacceptable in the food and dairy industry. However, both PTFE and UHMW-PE do not impart any taste or odor, and are non-toxic, making them an ideal solution to this challenge.

Challenge 8: Compliance and hygienic standards

Finally, engineers must navigate the FDA, 3-A Dairy, and customer audits while balancing performance and cost. Fortunately, PTFE and UHMW are available in FDA-compliant grades and are used in 3-A Dairy-compliant designs.

PTFE vs. UHMW-PE Seals in Food and Dairy Applications

Here is a table to help you choose between PTFE and UHMW-PE for polymer seals in the food and dairy industry.

If Your Primary Concern Is…Choose:Reason
Aggressive chemicals, oxidizers, or caustic CIP/SIP agentsPTFEUnmatched chemical inertness and high-temperature stability
Steam sterilization or UV sanitationPTFEHandles heat and radiation without degradation
Abrasion, impact, or misalignmentUHMW-PEExcellent toughness and wear resistance
Cost-effective wear surfaces in moderate cleaning regimesUHMW-PEEconomical and durable for non-critical seals
Low friction, precision dynamic sealingPTFEVery low coefficient of friction and dry-running capability
Hygienic, FDA / 3-A compliant designEitherBoth are available in food-grade, non-contaminating formulations

Solutions for Polymer Seals in Food and Dairy Applications

There are several challenges engineers face when designing for food and dairy designs. However, the right choice of material can address many of these issues, and both PTFE and UHMW-PE are popular choices.  

The experts at Advanced EMC are here to help you find the right sealing solution, from the type of seal you need to the best material for your food and dairy applications. Contact us today to learn more!