by Sara McCaslin, PhD Sara McCaslin, PhD No Comments

Machined and Molded Polymer Bearings: Nylon 66, PEEK, and PPS

Nylon 66, PEEK, and PPS are available in bearing grades, but how should they be manufactured? The choice of manufacturing method can have a significant impact on their tolerances, performance, and cost. 

This blog post focuses on machined and molded polymer bearings, including their benefits and limits, how they compare to metal options, and the best ways of manufacturing bearings made from three very different materials: Nylon 66, PEEK, and PPS. 

Introduction to Polymer Bearings

Polymer bearings are low-friction, lightweight alternatives to traditional bearings. They are corrosion-resistant and offer varying degrees of chemical resistance. Polymer bearings are also known for their ability to run dry or with minimal lubrication, as well as good wear characteristics. They are also electrically insulating and offer quieter operation than their metal counterparts.

However, polymer bearings do have their limits. They are more susceptible to thermal expansion and may have lower load limits and PV than their metal counterparts, but the addition of fillers can mitigate this issue. In some cases, they may be susceptible to moisture uptake. 

The table below summarizes the major differences between metal and polymer bearings.

Metal vs Polymer Bearings

FeatureMetal BearingsPolymer Bearings
FrictionLow only with lubricationLow due to inherent lubricity
LubricationRequiredOften not required
Wear MechanismAbrasive/adhesive fatigueTransfer film formation
CorrosionPossibleNearly immune
Shock/VibrationNo dampingNatural damping
SpeedHighModerate
LoadHigherModerate
Temperature LimitsExcellentVaries by polymer
MaintenanceHigherVery low

Machined vs. Molded Polymer Bearings

Machined bearings are best for small production runs where tight tolerances and complex geometries are involved, and machining is ideal for prototypes, custom components, and specialty rotating equipment. This approach to manufacturing bearings also allows the material to remain homogenous with no molded-in stresses.

Molded bearings are the best option for high-volume production, and they are more cost-effective for simpler geometries. Molding also means reduced part-to-part variation; however, molded-in stress may be present, and there are limits to surface finish.

When choosing between machined and molded polymer bearings, the key factors are:

  • Geometry
  • Tolerances
  • Cost
  • Production volume

Nylon 66, PEEK, and PPS

Among the various options for polymer bearings are Nylon 66, PPS, and PEEK. The table below summarizes the differences between these materials.

Performance Comparison: Nylon 66 vs. PPS vs. PEEK

Property / FactorNylon 66PPSPEEK
Max Continuous Use Temperature~100–120°C~200–220°C~240–260°C
Wear ResistanceGood (improved with lubrication)Very goodExcellent (especially filled grades)
FrictionLowLowVery low
Moisture AbsorptionHigh (can swell, affects tolerances)Very lowVery low
Dimensional StabilityModerate (affected by humidity)HighVery high
Chemical ResistanceModerateExcellentExcellent
Mechanical StrengthGoodHighVery high
Impact ResistanceVery goodModerateGood
Creep ResistanceModerateGoodExcellent
PV CapabilityLow–MediumMedium–HighHigh–Very High
CostLowMediumHigh
Machining SuitabilityExcellentExcellentExcellent (best with filled grades)
MoldabilityExcellentGoodGood
Typical ApplicationsRollers, appliance bearings, automotive interior componentsPumps, compressors, chemical processing, precision housingsAerospace, oil & gas, high-speed bearings, semiconductor tools

Manufacturing Nylon 66, PEEK, and PPS Bearings

There are several different bearing materials available, but of interest in this blog post are Nylon 66, PPS, and PEEK bearings.

Nylon 66

Nylon 66 is very easy to mold because of its low viscosity, forging processing window, and good flow characteristics. However, there is going to be high mold shrinkage, which requires careful part design to keep warpage under control. Nylon also absorbs moisture, which means that drying is important before molding takes place. 

Nylon also machines easily, but its high ductility leads to stringy chips that necessitate the use of chip-breakers. Heat buildup is also an issue with nylon, and moisture absorption can impact the level of precision that can be achieved. It does, however, respond well to secondary machining on already molded parts, but does not work well with tight-tolerance CNC components.

PEEK

Because PEEK high a high melt temperature around 343°C, a very narrow thermal window that requires precision temperature control, and requires a heated mold, it is considered challenging to mold. However, with the right processing parameters and careful design, PPS can be molded and can manufacture parts with excellent thermal and mechanical performance (but is more expensive). 

PEEK is very difficult to machine. Its high modulus and hardness make it especially tough on cutting tools, and reinforced grades can be highly abrasive. It also generates an abundance of heat, thus requiring the use of coolants. However, machining PEEK supports excellent tolerances and surface finishes when the right combination of feed and speed is used. In fact, PEEK is frequently machined for low-volume aerospace and medical components.

PPS

PPS is not as easy to mold as Nylon 66 because its melt temperature is higher, it possesses a narrower processing window, and has high viscosity. However, it does exhibit very low shrinkage and excellent dimensional stability. PPS molding is very predictable and an excellent option once the right processing parameters have been figured out.

PPS is machinable, definitely more so than Nylon, but tends to be more brittle. It produces short chips and there is a risk of edge chipping during more aggressive cuts. On the other hand, it is good for tight tolerances. Note that filled grades of PPS can accelerate tool wear. Machining PPS is ideal for high-precision parts where dimensional stability is important.

Conclusion

Machined and molded Nylon 66, PPS, and PEEK bearings continue to gain traction because of properties such as low friction, wear characteristics, damping, corrosion resistance, and chemical compatibility. If you are in need of polymer bearings, Advanced EMC is here to help. Our team of engineers and bearing experts can help you from initial design to manufacturing to testing. Contact us today to learn more.

by Sara McCaslin, PhD Sara McCaslin, PhD No Comments

Wear and Friction in Polymer Bearings

When bearings fail, friction and wear are often the primary causes. Friction and wear in polymer bearings are critical factors in their design and performance. In fact, friction and wear influence everything from energy efficiency to service life. 

In this article, we examine the fundamentals of friction and wear, their impact on polymer bearing performance, and why understanding PV values is crucial for selecting the appropriate material. Whether you work in aerospace, medical devices, or industrial automation, this guide will help you make informed engineering decisions.

Understanding Friction

One way to define friction is the resistive force that occurs when two surfaces move against each other. In the context of polymer bearings, friction plays a key role in determining energy efficiency, heat generation, and overall wear behavior. 

Friction arises from surface interactions at the microscopic level. Even polished surfaces have asperities (tiny peaks and valleys) that cause mechanical interlocking and adhesion. In polymer bearings, friction behavior is influenced not only by surface roughness and contact pressure but also by factors such as lubrication, temperature, and material composition. The table below summarizes the main friction mechanisms at work in polymer bearings.

MechanismDescription
AdhesionIntermolecular bonding between polymer and counterface contributes to resistance.
Surface DeformationPolymer deforms under load during sliding, adding to frictional resistance.
Viscoelastic DissipationInternal energy loss from viscoelastic behavior increases the friction coefficient.
Transfer Film FormationA layer of polymer transfers to the counterface, altering friction over time.
Stick-Slip PhenomenonAlternating adhesion and sliding causes vibrations or unstable motion.
Surface Roughness/TextureMicrostructure of surfaces influences contact area and frictional behavior.

High friction in polymer bearings can lead to excessive heat buildup, accelerated wear, and energy loss in mechanical systems. However, polymers often offer lower coefficients of friction than metals, which makes them an excellent option for reducing drag and operating efficiently without the need for continuous lubrication. This is especially advantageous in applications where maintenance access is limited, the environment is cryogenic, or cleanliness and sanitation are critical.

Understanding Wear

Wear is the gradual removal or deformation of material at solid surfaces due to mechanical action. In polymer bearings, wear not only affects part longevity but can also significantly alter dimensions and negatively impact performance over time, potentially leading to even increased friction, misalignment, or failure.

Wear occurs through various mechanisms, including abrasion, adhesion, fatigue, and erosion. In polymer bearings, the dominant type of wear often depends on operating conditions such as load, speed, temperature, and the presence (or absence) of lubricants. The main wear types are summarized in the table below.

Wear TypeDescriptionCommon CausesRelevance to Polymers
Abrasive WearHard particles or rough surfaces wear away material.Contaminants, rough counterfaces, high contact stressCommon in dirty or poorly filtered environments.
Adhesive WearSurfaces bond at contact points and then tear apart during movement.High pressure, poor lubricationCan be minimized by using low-friction polymer grades.
Fatigue WearCracks form due to repeated cyclic loading, leading to material removal.Repeated loading/unloading cyclesImportant for dynamic applications (e.g., pumps).
Erosive WearMaterial is gradually removed by impact from particles or fluid flow.High-speed fluids with particulatesLess common, but relevant in slurry or fluid transport.

Polymers typically have a lower elastic modulus and can deform under load, which helps reduce localized stress and delay wear, provided the material is selected correctly and the PV value remains within limits.

Friction and Wear in Polymer Bearings

Polymer bearings behave differently than metal under friction and wear. Their unique tribological properties—including low friction coefficients, self-lubricating capabilities, and tolerance for misalignment—make them ideal for applications where conventional metal bearings would struggle to perform.

PV Value: What It Means and Why It Matters

A key metric used in evaluating polymer bearing performance is the PV value, which stands for Pressure × Velocity. It quantifies the combination of load (P, in psi or MPa) and surface speed (V, in ft/min or m/s) that a bearing can withstand before experiencing excessive wear or thermal failure. In general, higher PV values indicate that the bearing can withstand greater stress and speed. Exceeding the limiting PV can lead to thermal softening, deformation, or accelerated wear of the polymer material.

Every polymer material has a limiting PV, which is the maximum combination of pressure and velocity it can handle under steady conditions. Engineers must stay below this threshold when designing systems to prevent performance breakdowns. Factors that affect limiting PV include:

  • Material type (e.g., PTFE, PEEK, UHMW)
  • Lubrication conditions
  • Heat dissipation
  • Bearing geometry and clearance

Choosing a polymer with a suitable PV rating is essential when operating at high loads, high speeds, or both. Some high-performance polymers even incorporate fillers—such as glass, carbon, or graphite—to increase wear resistance and raise the limiting power-to-weight (PV) threshold. Typical values are in the table below.

MaterialCoefficient of FrictionWear ResistanceLimiting PVTypical Enhancements
PTFEVery Low (0.05–0.10)FairLowGlass, bronze, or carbon fillers
PEEKModerate (0.15–0.30)ExcellentHighCarbon fiber, PTFE, graphite
UHMW-PELow (0.10–0.20)GoodModerateUV stabilizers, glass fiber
Nylon (PA)Moderate (0.15–0.25)Good (in dry conditions)Moderate to High (with lube)Moly disulfide
Filled PTFEVery Low (0.04–0.09)GoodModerateGraphite, MoS₂, or glass fiber blends
Polymer Beads

Choosing the Right Polymer for Friction and Wear

Selecting the optimal polymer for a bearing application requires more than just knowing the coefficient of friction. It involves understanding how various operating conditions interact with the material’s tribological profile.

Here are the major factors engineers should consider:

Load and Speed (PV Value): The combined pressure and velocity—expressed as the PV value—should stay below the material’s limiting PV to prevent overheating, deformation, or rapid wear. For high-load, high-speed applications, advanced materials like PEEK or filled PTFE are often necessary.

Temperature Range: Thermal stability varies widely across polymers. PEEK and PTFE perform well in high-temperature environments, while materials like UHMW-PE or nylon may soften or creep under prolonged exposure to heat.

Lubrication Conditions: Some applications operate with continuous lubrication, while others require dry-running performance. PTFE and UHMW-PE offer excellent dry lubricity, making them ideal for maintenance-free or clean-room conditions.

Chemical Exposure: Exposure to aggressive chemicals or cleaners can cause degradation of many plastics. PTFE offers broad chemical resistance, while nylon and acetal may be more limited depending on the environment.

Wear Resistance and Service Life: If durability is a primary concern, choose polymers that exhibit low wear rates under dynamic conditions. Fillers such as carbon fiber, glass, and graphite can significantly improve wear resistance without sacrificing too much in terms of friction.

Cost and Availability: High-performance polymers, such as PEEK and specialty-filled PTFE blends, come at a cost, however. For less demanding applications, materials like nylon or acetal may offer a more cost-effective solution.

Conclusion

Friction and wear are critical in polymer bearing design and specification. These factors directly impact performance, efficiency, and service life. Understanding how such friction and wear operate, along with the impact of PV value, temperature, lubrication, and material composition on behavior, empowers engineers to make informed decisions. Whether the application requires high-speed, dry-running conditions or chemical resistance in a corrosive environment, selecting the right polymer is crucial. At Advanced EMC Technologies, we specialize in high-performance polymer solutions engineered for demanding tribological environments. Contact us today to find the right material for your next bearing application.