by Daniel Mays Daniel Mays No Comments

Meeting SEMI Standards for Seal Purity, Outgassing, and Chemical Resistance

Semiconductor fabrication facilities are among the most demanding environments for seal materials on the planet because a single contamination event can scrap a wafer batch worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. And every polymer, lubricant, and elastomeric material contains residual volatiles. SEMI standards deal with how to take these residual volatiles into account when designing components, such as seals, for wafer fabrication environments. The purpose of this blog post is to discuss what SEMI standards actually require and how engineers select bearings to meet them.

The SEMI Standards Landscape

SEMI standards serve as the common language of the global semiconductor supply chain. For example, SEMI standards define fitness for use by establishing minimum thresholds (e.g., outgassing limits, contamination levels, chemical compatibility requirements) that a component must meet to be considered safe for use in semiconductor manufacturing environments. These standards also protect the wafer from contamination that can destroy device yield and make suppliers accountable. 

By referencing a SEMI standard in a procurement specification, a fabrication engineer can require documented, third-party-verifiable compliance rather than relying on a supplier’s marketing claims. These standards also enable global interoperability: tools, chemicals, and components built to SEMI standards can move across fabrications and geographies without extensive re-qualification. This serves as a major economic benefit in a highly globalized industry.

SEMI F-Series (Facilities and Materials)

The SEMI F-series serves as the most relevant category for seals. Standards like SEMI F57 govern polymeric components and wetted surface materials used in UHP (ultra-high purity) gas distribution systems, covering surface finish requirements, material qualification, and cleanliness protocols. SEMI F2 addresses test methods for metallic contamination on wetted surfaces. These are the specs a seal or bearing supplier is most likely to be asked to demonstrate compliance with.

SEMI C-Series (Chemicals)

The SEMI C-Series of standards defines purity grades and acceptable contamination levels for process chemicals such as acids, solvents, and oxidizers. While these standards primarily govern the chemicals themselves, they are also critically important for material selection. If your seal is sitting in a bath governed by a C-series chemical specification, that specification indirectly defines the chemical resistance your seal must demonstrate. Engineers selecting materials for wetted components need to understand what chemical grade they are designing for.

SEMI S2 (Safety Guidelines for Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment)

S2 is a broad equipment safety standard with direct implications for materials selection. It addresses chemical containment, materials of construction for chemical-wetted components, ventilation requirements, and labeling. It’s often the standard a tool OEM must satisfy as a condition of fab entry, making it a gateway document that touches bearing and seal design.

Purity: Metallic Contamination and Ionic Cleanliness

When it comes to cleanliness in fabrication environments, the core concern when it comes to contamination is the presence of trace metals (Fe, Na, K, Ca) as killer defects in semiconductor devices. Both dynamic seals are going to shed particles, and this includes wear debris, surface oxides, and manufacturing residues. Among the key material considerations are the use of PTFE bearings and seals, while other options include ceramic bearings (Si₃N₄, ZrO₂) as the go-to for ultra-pure applications and surface treatments (e.g., electropolishing, passivation, and their limits).

Outgassing: The Invisible Contamination Problem

Through outgassing, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) deposit on wafer surfaces and disrupt lithography, deposition, and etch processes. Two standards commonly apply: SEMI F10 and NASA ASTM E595, serving as the benchmarks engineers reference. And there are two key metrics that matter: ML (Total Mass Loss) and CVCM (Collected Volatile Condensable Materials). The general targets used by engineers are TML < 1.0% and CVCM < 0.1%. And remember that a material can pass TML and fail CVCM. Bearings and seals must comply with both. However, CVCM is the one that matters most because it captures what actually re-deposits on a cooler surface.

In seal assemblies, the vast majority of problems come from lubricants and greases (silicone-based greases are particularly problematic in vacuum) and adhesives, polymer cage materials, and elastomeric seals. This includes nylon and acetal bearing cages and standard elastomeric seals with curative that can volatize under heat and vacuum. To avoid these issues, industry best practice is to use …

  • PFPE-based dry film lubricants
  • PTFE lip seals (which are known for their high purity and self-lubrication)
  • Perfluoroelastomers (FFKM)

Bake-Out Procedures

As already discussed, every polymer, lubricant, and elastomeric material contains residual volatiles that may include trapped solvents from manufacturing, absorbed moisture, unreacted monomers, and plasticizer fractions. At room temperature, these substances release slowly over weeks or months. Elevated temperature, however, drives that same process in hours, forcing the material to shed its residual volatiles before it is ever installed. This process is known as bake-out and must be accomplished for a material to be safe to use in a high-purity environment.

Chemical Resistance: Surviving the Process Chemistry

The process chemistry involved with semiconductor manufacturers includes chemicals such as HF, H₂SO₄, HCl, H₂O₂, IPA, NMP, ozone, and aggressive plasma environments. And although a material may be listed as chemically resistant on a data sheet, that does not account for critical variables such as concentration, temperature, and exposure time. Swell, extraction, and stress cracking are the failure modes that tables consistently miss.

The material compatibility hierarchy for seals is:

  • FFKM (Kalrez®, Perlast®): broadest chemical resistance, low extractables
  • PTFE: excellent passive resistance but poor dynamic sealing performance
  • EPDM / FKM (Viton®): acceptable in some applications, disqualified in others (HF is a hard no for FKM)

Conclusion

SEMI compliance is not just a checklist, but rather a systems-level engineering discipline. Material selection, outgassing qualification, and chemical resistance validation must work together to result in a fully SEMI-compliant seal. Engineers who treat these as a system rather than separate line items build better products. If you are looking for a SEMI-compliant sealing solution, contact the engineers at Advanced EMC today.

by Daniel Mays Daniel Mays No Comments

Creep and Stress Relaxation in High-Performance Polymer Seals

Creep and stress relaxation are types of time-dependent deformation that matter in sealing as too many engineers in the field typically see “assembled dry, passed leak test, then seeps later.” Sealing force is not a fixed number: it decays over time. And polymer seals can be affected by factors such as viscoelasticity, temperature sensitivity, and constraint effects. 

This article explores core definitions and concepts related to creep and stress relaxation, then covers how different polymer sealing materials behave and tips for the design and installation of seals to minimize these issues.

Definitions and Concepts for Creep and Stress Relaxation

Creep is defined as the increase in strain under constant applied stress. The constant stress can be, for example,  contact stress from interference, bolt load transferred through a gasket, or differential pressure loading. The results of creep are dimensional change, extrusion growth, reduced interference, and/or a contact pattern shift.

Cold flow refers to creep at moderate or ambient temperature and is controlled by a combination of stress and constraints. As a type of creep, cold flow is dominated by a combination of viscoelastic and viscoplastic deformation under a sustained compressive load.

Stress relaxation is decreasing stress under constant strain as the result of fixed gland volume, captured seal, or fixed squeeze. This can be a problem for static seals, where the gland maintains constant displacement, not constant stress. The results of stress relaxation include clamp-load loss, loss of sealing force, and an increased possibility of leakage.

Polymers can still look like they kept their shape, but they may not be pushing as hard against the metal anymore. In elastomers, “compression set” is mainly about the rubber not springing back. In polymers, the bigger issue is that the internal stress slowly bleeds off over time, so sealing force drops even if the part does not look significantly deformed.

When a polymer is compressed, part of the squeezed portion will spring back right away, but part of it returns slowly, and another part never returns because the material has permanently shifted shape. The longer a seal is under compression, the more the polymer begins to relax and flow, so even after the load is removed, it may not be able to rebound to restore the original sealing force. 

And if you compress a polymer seal and then release it, the force on the way back will usually be lower than on the way in because some energy is lost inside the material. That’s why repeated squeeze-and-release cycles will not bring the seal back to the original force level.

Material Behavior in High-Performance Seal Polymers

PTFE (unfilled): PTFE has extremely low friction and is very chemically resistant, but it gives up the sealing load over time. Virgin PTFE tends to creep and relax under sustained compression, therefore requiring a strong gland support, tight extrusion-gap control, or spring energization.

PTFE (filled): Filled PTFE holds up better because fillers increase stiffness and reduce cold-flow behavior. Filled PTFE can usually retain its sealing force longer than virgin PTFE, but the filler used can also increase friction and may affect counterface wear.

PEEK: PEEK is typically chosen when long-term load retention matters greatly. PEEK’s higher stiffness means better resistance to creep and stress relaxation, though solid gland design and surface control still matter. PEEK is also available in filled variants that can impact its properties.

UHMW-PE: UHMW-PE is excellent for abrasion and low friction, but it can still relax under long compressive dwell, especially if stresses are high or support is limited. It performs best when the design itself minimizes sustained stress and prevents extrusion.

PAI (Torlon): PAI offers the strongest resistance to time-dependent deformation in this group. It retains shape and sealing load well, making it a strong fit for high loads and elevated temperatures where other polymers may drift.

MaterialCreep ResistanceStress Relaxation ResistanceRebound After Long DwellExtrusion Risk (if poorly supported)
PTFE (unfilled)LowLowLowHigh
PTFE (filled)ModerateModerateLow–ModerateModerate
PEEKHighHighModerate–HighLow–Moderate
UHMW-PELow–ModerateLow–ModerateModerateModerate–High
PAI (Torlon)Very HighHigh–Very HighHighLow

Design Variables That Control Creep and Relaxation

Gland constraint is the first major factor. A fully confined gland gives the seal fewer places to move, which cuts down creep flow and helps prevent extrusion. If the gland is only partially confined, any clearance becomes an escape route for the seal, and support has to be both radial and axial. Radial support keeps the polymer from pushing into the extrusion gap under pressure. Axial support helps prevent shifting and uneven edge loading. The small geometry details count as well; add corner radii and lead-in chamfers, and avoid sharp edges that create stress concentrations. Also, remember tolerance stack-up: as the seal relaxes, the “effective” clearance and contact conditions can change even if the metal parts do not.

More squeeze is not going to automatically be safer. Higher initial stress can accelerate creep and stress relaxation, especially with heat. The goal is to start with enough contact stress to seal, then still have enough after the material settles. That means designing around the minimum required contact stress at end-of-life, not just at assembly.

Extrusion gap control is about finding where pressure can escape and blocking it. The gap changes with temperature, pressure-driven hardware deflection, and assembly variation. Backup rings help by mechanically closing off that path. Their details matter, though.

Surface finish can make or break long-term performance. Roughness peaks concentrate stress and encourage localized flow, and surface lay can create leak paths. With filled polymers, counterface hardness matters because wear risk can increase with the wrong pairing. Aim for a finish that reduces stress peaks without creating new friction or lubrication issues.

Hardware stiffness also impacts load retention. Flexible joints can magnify clamp-load loss as polymers relax, so stiffer flanges, spacers, and bolt patterns will significantly assist with stability. For demanding duty cycles, spring-energized seals are an excellent option as they add an additional force to compensate for potential issues, such as relaxation, wear, thermal cycling, and small misalignment. 

Installation Tips for Mitigating Creep and Stress Relaxation

Many issues with creep start at installation, where a small nick, a cut, or a twisted seal can leak early, then get blamed on cold flow. Over-compressing the seal during assembly also makes it worse by driving high stress that speeds up relaxation and can leave permanent deformation. A simple fix is better handling and proper lubrication during installation to reduce the potential for surface damage and help the seal seat without problems due to uneven stress.

Load management matters just as much after assembly. Polymer gaskets and seats often benefit from controlled retorque protocols (when the application allows it) because the initial load can drop quickly during the first dwell. A common approach is initial torque, a short wait, then a retorque and verification check. Keep in mind that if over-torque pushes stress too high, it can accelerate creep and shorten the sealing life.

Finally, storage can quietly pre-load your failure. If a seal sits compressed on the shelf, it may relax before it sees service, starting life with serious issues related to sealing force. Temperature history matters as well, especially if parts are stored near heat sources or in hot warehouses. When possible, ship and store seals uncompressed, and for critical applications, controlled conditioning and careful packaging can protect long-term load retention.

Conclusion

Creep, cold flow, and stress relaxation are not mysterious defects, but rather predictable behaviors that appear whenever polymers sit under load for long periods. For this reason, treat them as design inputs and build a sealing system around them by choosing the right material, controlling deformation with proper gland constraint, relying on stiff hardware to maintain load, and validating the design with tests that match real pressure, temperature, and dwell-time conditions.

Advanced EMC is here to help with all your sealing needs, and our engineers are happy to help you navigate your way through potential creep and stress relaxation issues. Contact us today!