by Sara McCaslin Sara McCaslin No Comments

How to Choose the Right Polymer Seal Material: A Failure-Mode Guide

Most spec sheets are organized by material (PTFE, PEEK, FKM), but almost none are organized by what is actually going wrong in a system. That is backward, since seal failure is the symptom you actually have in hand. 

This failure-mode guide starts from the failure rather than the catalog. This discussion includes seal extrusion, swelling, pressure trapping, wear, and more. For each failure mode, we discuss what it looks like, its root cause, and what to specify for the material.

What Causes Seal Extrusion

Extrusion looks like chunks torn away or flowing into the extrusion gap, usually on the dynamic/pressure side. Extrusion is really a localized case of creep. Under sustained differential pressure, the seal material behaves less like a solid and more like a very slow-moving fluid, flowing into whatever clearance gap it can find. Higher pressure, larger gaps, and higher temperature (which softens the material and accelerates creep) all speed this up. Keep in mind that elastomers have comparatively low creep resistance: under continuous load they keep deforming rather than settling into a stable state, which is exactly what makes them prone to extrusion. 

Thermoplastics like PTFE resist extrusion better than elastomers mainly because they are less elastic, but not because they are immune to creep. Unfilled PTFE, for example, is known for cold flow under sustained load. Filled PTFE compounds (glass, carbon, or bronze) or spring-energized PTFE seal designs are typically specified when extrusion resistance under continuous pressure is the priority. No material choice fully solves an oversized clearance gap; review the design before committing to a material change.

Extrusion and compression set are really two faces of the same creep-driven behavior: one shows up as material flowing away, the other as material failing to recover its shape.

What Causes Seal Compression Set

Compression set is straightforward to spot because it results in a flat-sided cross-section. Compression set results in leakage at low pressure. This can be counterintuitive, because leaks are usually associated with higher pressures. Compression set occurs when a material loses its elastic memory and can no longer rebound over time. It relates to a material’s ability to recover its shape after sustained compression. One fix for compression set is to look for materials engineered for low compression-set values. Also, because compression set develops gradually, it is a good candidate for a preventive replacement schedule rather than reactive repair.

What Causes Seal Hardening / Glazing

Another seal problem is hardening and glazing. When it occurs, the seal will have visible cracking or a glassy/glazed dynamic face, and ties in with a broader loss of elasticity across the whole seal. Two different things can lead to hardening and glazing:

  • Excessive speed that generates frictional heat at the face
  • Fluid/material incompatibility or sustained high fluid temperature

If hardening or glazing is a problem, look for materials with good heat resistance. Confirm actual continuous-use temperature rating (not just peak rating) against real operating conditions, not catalog optimism.

What Causes Seal Swelling

Swelling occurs when a seal loses its molded shape and may appear larger than the spec. Swelling is fluid absorption (water is the most common culprit) or chemical incompatibility. This is a compatibility problem, not a strength problem, so a stronger material is not the fix. Instead, check a chemical-compatibility chart before specifying a material. 

What Causes Seal Scarring

Dents or cuts on the lip of the seal, as well as scratches on the dynamic side, are called scarring. This is usually not a material issue but the result of improper storage, sharp installation tools, or contaminants/scars in the bore or rod. Rather than pursuing a material change, fix the installation practice by supplying proper tools or ensuring the bore is clean, for example. If the scratches can be traced back to contaminated fluid, the system needs flushing. This failure mode does not call for a material or product change.

What Causes Seal Wear

Seal wear is the gradual thinning or degradation concentrated on the seal’s dynamic face, usually from inadequate lubrication or excessive lateral loading. To mitigate premature wear, engineers should consider the friction coefficient and self-lubrication as much as material hardness. The solution to excessive dynamic wear is usually a low-friction, self-lubricating polymer (PTFE, UHMWPE).

What Causes Seal Pressure Trapping and Spiral Failure

Both pressure trapping and spiral failure skew the geometry and design. In pressure trapping, adjacent seals facing the same direction trap fluid, and the fix is a back-pumping design rather than a material change. Spiral failure results when an O-ring twists under long, fast strokes. In this case, the best approach is to fix the geometry (e.g., design a different cross-section) rather than select a new material.

A Seal Decision Framework Quick-Reference

To help you quickly see what to do about the most common seal failure modes, we developed the table below. 

Failure Mode What You’ll Notice Root Cause Material Direction Is This Actually a Design/Install Issue?
Extrusion Chunks torn away or flowing into the clearance gap, usually on the pressure side Creep  – sustained pressure drives the material into the gap over time Filled PTFE (glass/carbon/bronze) or spring-energized PTFE over standard elastomer Partly: oversized clearance gap needs a design review too
Compression Set Flat-sided cross-section; leakage at low pressure Creep-driven loss of elastic memory Material engineered for low compression set No: this is a material property question
Hardening / Glazing Cracking or a glassy dynamic face; general stiffening Frictional heat from speed, or fluid incompatibility/high fluid temp Verify actual continuous-use temp rating vs. real operating conditions Sometimes: check speed/friction before blaming the material
Swelling Soft, shape loss, seal reads larger than spec Fluid absorption (often water) or chemical incompatibility Check chemical-compatibility chart before specifying (nylon is prone) No: compatibility problem, not a strength problem
Scarring Dents/cuts on the lip; scratches on the dynamic side Improper storage, sharp install tools, or contaminated bore/fluid Rarely a material fix Yes: fix installation practice or flush the system first
Wear Gradual thinning concentrated on the dynamic face Inadequate lubrication or excessive lateral loading Low-friction, self-lubricating polymer (PTFE, UHMWPE) Partly: check lubrication/loading alongside material
Pressure Trapping / Spiral Failure Burst at the weaker of two adjacent seals; spiral cuts on an O-ring Same-direction adjacent seals trap fluid; long fast strokes twist the O-ring Rarely the fix Yes: back-pumping design or different cross-section geometry

Application spotlights

In hydraulic and pneumatic cylinders, extrusion and wear are the primary risks with high pressures and high speeds. Swelling, chemical compatibility, and purity requirements are the primary challenges for semiconductor seal applications. In aerospace applications, hardening and compression set driven by wide temperature swings are among the major challenges. Chemical processing seals often face obstacles with regard to swelling and chemical compatibility. 

Conclusion

Seal failures are typically addressed after the fact: a part fails, is replaced in kind, and fails the same way again. The more effective approach is to identify the governing failure mode before specifying a material, not after. Pressure, temperature, chemical exposure, and duty cycle each point to different material requirements; addressing them upfront is more reliable than correcting them after a failure occurs.

For applications where the right material is not clear, our engineering team is available to review your specifications and recommend a solution. Contact us today and let us utilize our knowledge and experience to help you choose the right seal.

by Sara McCaslin Sara McCaslin 1 Comment

Why Compression Set is not Enough for High-Performance Seals

A seal is a system, not just a compound. A material can meet published compression-set, hardness, and chemical-compatibility requirements yet still fail early because the qualification plan did not reproduce the governing service conditions or establish sufficient margin across the seal, gland, and hardware tolerance stack.

High-performance sealing applications can combine elevated temperature, pressure cycling, aggressive media, long required life, and tight dimensional tolerances. Under these conditions, a single static material property rarely predicts field performance. The relevant question is whether the complete seal-and-hardware system retains enough contact pressure, extrusion resistance, and chemical stability to meet its defined leakage requirement throughout service. 

This article looks at the complications that can arise from depending too heavily on compression set when selecting a material for a high-performance seal.

The Property Everyone Tests vs. The Property That Actually Predicts Failure

The industry’s default screening test for high-performance seals is compression set because it measures how much strain an elastomer or polymer fails to recover after a sustained compressive load is removed. It is useful as a baseline for comparing materials and monitoring production batch consistency.

However, compression set does not directly measure in-service sealing force, but remains useful for assessing permanent deformation and loss of available interference after unloading. It should be interpreted alongside force-retention, environmental-aging, and assembly-level data.

A more relevant property is actually stress relaxation. When an elastomer or polymer is held at constant strain, the stress it exerts against the sealing surfaces decreases progressively over time. Even when the gland holds the seal at nominally constant deflection, the compressive counterforce can decay with time

In many static sealing applications, loss of contact force can be a primary contributor to leakage, provided that the remaining contact pressure falls below the level required by the pressure differential, media, surface condition, and the gland geometry.

Consider this: a material can look suitable on a compression set chart, but still be quietly losing its sealing force while in service. This is why premature seal failures cannot be explained by the data the design team already has.

Why This Gap Matters More as Applications Get More Demanding

In high-performance systems, such as those with elevated temperature, pressure cycling, aggressive chemical exposure, tight gland tolerances, and long required service life (often occurring simultaneously), the mechanisms that reduce contact stress accelerate, while gland clearances under pressure introduce a secondary risk: extrusion.

Whether stress relaxation, creep, or both govern depends on the boundary condition and system compliance. A rigid, fixed-depth gland more closely resembles constant-strain loading, while a compliant flange joint or spring-loaded system may permit deformation growth and load redistribution. 

Standard compression set testing is typically run under a single fixed set of conditions, and these conditions may not represent the actual thermal and chemical environment the seal experiences in service. This means that the datasheet number may not transfer to the actual service application at all.

For applications that require a predictable service life, methods that model degradation over time are increasingly used to estimate realistic storage or service life rather than relying on a single-point spec.

Qualify for the Application, Not the Spec Sheet

When you have a high-performance sealing application, a datasheet property serves as an excellent screening tool but not a guarantee of performance. When evaluating seals for demanding service, ask whether the qualification data you are looking at reflects the actual service environment, not just whether the material passed a standard test.

Want to learn how to better qualify high-performance seals? Read the second part of this article series, From Datasheet to Service Life: A Better Framework for Seal Qualification. And contact us for your sealing solution needs!